But thats going to be up to the public to decide what

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: NASA programs to the needs of business and industry. Gonzaga Debate Institute 2011 64 Mercury Politics NASA Policy – Triggers Debate Scope and purpose of space exploration programs controversial Morgan, Congressional Research Service spet in science and technology policy, 7-8-10 [Daniel, Congressional Research Service, “The Future of NASA: Space Policy Issues Facing Congress”, p.4,, accessed 6-20-11, AFB] What Should NASA Do? Based on this wide variety of objectives, NASA has established programs in human spaceflight, science, aeronautics, and education. The largest and most visible effort, in human spaceflight, faces considerable uncertainty about its proper scope and aims. The content of the science, aeronautics, and education programs is less controversial but still faces questions about scope, balance, and other issues. Gonzaga Debate Institute 2011 65 Mercury Politics NASA Policy – Unpopular – Senate – Rockefeller (D-WV) and Hutchinson (R-TX) Senators Rockefeller (D-WV) and Hutchinson (R-TX) will issue a subpoena to NASA. Foust, Aerospace analyst, 6/24/11 (Jim, “Senators push NASA for Documents”, Space Politics,, accessed 6/25/11, EK) Members of the Senate Commerce Committee, and their staff, have made it clear for months that they have been frustrated with the lack of information they have received from NASA about its plans to implement provisions of the 2010 NASA authorization act, particularly regarding the Space Launch System (SLS) heavy-lift rocket. Last month they formally requested a comprehensive set of documents from NASA on various programs, including SLS, the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, and commercial crew initiatives. The committee’s patience may have finally run out. In a letter Wednesday to NASA administration Charles Bolden, Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), the chair and ranking member of the full committee, warned NASA that if it did not provide specific documents to the committee by the end of the day Monday it would issue a subpoena for them. “While NASA has provided a partial response to our May 18 letter, you have thwarted our oversight activities by withholding key documents that describe NASA’s compliance with the 2010 Act,” the letter states. It adds that in one case “NASA was withholding at least 19 separate drafts of a report it is required to submit to Congress under Section 309 of the 2010 Act.” That section of the 2010 authorization act requires NASA to provide a “detailed report” on the agency’s plans to implement the SLS and MPCV. NASA released a draft report in January but has yet to provide the final report. So, will this subpoena compel NASA to release the documents? Or, perhaps, encourage NASA to accelerate release of the final report and make a formal decision on its SLS plans, which recent reports indicate are all but a done deal? Gonzaga Debate Institute 2011 66 Mercury Politics NASA Funding – Budget Debate (1/2) NASA funding will trigger budget battle Space Politics...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/14/2013 for the course POL 090 taught by Professor Framer during the Spring '13 term at Shimer.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online