This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: a weak economy”
, http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/09/nation/la-na-obama-jobs-20110709, accessed 7-11-11]
A steady stream of polls has shown that voters are unhappy with Obama's handling of the economy. Even
members of the president's party fear that the economy could ultimately be Obama's political undoing.
Henry Cisneros, a housing secretary under former President Clinton, said: "You can't win this if the
economic foundation is truly shaky. He really does have to turn this around, in my judgment." Gonzaga Debate Institute 2011
Politics Link Answer – Obama Won’t Spend Political Capital on NASA
NASA is a political football – Obama won’t spend political capital defending it
Cunningham, former Apollo pilot, 10
[Walter, 2-6-10, Houston Chronicle, “Taking a bite out of NASA”,
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/6854790.html, accessed 7-1-11]
President Barack Obama's budget proposal may not be a death knell for NASA, but it certainly would
accelerate America's downward spiral toward mediocrity in space exploration . Now it's up to NASA's
leaders to put the best face possible on this nail that the administration is trying to hammer into their coffin.
This proposal is not a “bold new course for human spaceflight,” nor is it a “fundamental
reinvigoration of NASA.” It is quite the opposite , and I have no doubt the people at NASA will see it for
what it is — a rationalization for pursuing mediocrity. It mandates huge changes and offers little hope for
the future. My heart goes out to those who have to defend it.
NASA has always been a political football. The agency's lifeblood is federal funding, and it has been
losing blood for several decades. The only hope now for a lifesaving transfusion to stop the hemorrhaging
It is hard to be optimistic. President Obama has apparently decided the United States should not be in
the human spaceflight business. He obviously thinks NASA's historic mission is a waste of time and
money. Until just two months before his election, he was proposing to use the $18 billion NASA budget
as a piggybank to fund his favored education programs. With this budget proposal, he is taking a step
in that direction. Gonzaga Debate Institute 2011
Politics Link Answer – Space Not Key
Space policy will not be a factor for voters, it’s not important
Simberg, former supervisor and project manager for advanced space programs at
Rockwell International, 6-17-11
(Rand, The Examiner, “The surprise space policy debate”, http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/opinionzone/2011/06/surprise-space-policy-debate, 6/21/11) EK
Despite last night's question, though, it's unlikely that the election will swing on space policy -- the last
time space policy was important in a presidential election was over fifty years ago, when the nation was
still panicked by Sputnik, and Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy ran against Vice President (under
Eisenhower) Richard Nixon on the "missile gap" with the Soviet Union. Next year, most of the states in
which space is locally important -- Alabama, Texas, Utah, California -- won't be battlegrounds. The
only exception is the swing state of Florida, which the administration will almost certainly have to w...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/14/2013 for the course POL 090 taught by Professor Framer during the Spring '13 term at Shimer.
- Spring '13