gdi-2011-politics-master-file-mercury

Gdi-2011-politics-master-file-mercury

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: mendment in the form of a congressional finding that all ballistic missiles that transit space are space weapons. Members of Congress that vote against such a finding would be forced to admit that they are so opposed to the idea of using space to protect the U.S. against missile attack that they are willing to deny a simple and irrefutable fact in order to continue their opposition. It will serve to demonstrate how extreme this position has become. Weapons popular – Congress scared of China O'Farroll, MA in 'Non-Proliferation & International Security' at Kings College London, 10 (Tad, 8-4-10, “China Shoots Down a Second Satellite”, http://nukesofhazardblog.com/story/2010/8/4/142533/5958, LexisNexis, Accessed June 20th 2011, LGK] It is also hard to see how Chinas tests will help pave the way for future cooperation with the U.S President Barack Obama's June 2010 National Space Policy emphasized the important role of international cooperation in space and demonstrated the apparent willingness of the US to begin work on a space weapons treaty. However, news of China’s (OTCBB:NWCH) s January 2010 test may have ruffled feathers among members of Congress, whom Gregory Kulacki at the Union of Concerned Scientists noted, œwill want to deny China status as a member in good standing of the international community of space-faring nations. Ultimately though, this might not be something China is seeking to pursue. With its abundant financial resources and high level scientific know-how, the prestige of advancing its space based technologies by itself may prove too irresistible for Beijing. But quite how future tests will fit with Chinascommitment not to ˜to test, deploy or use any weapons, weapons systems or components in outer space, remains to be seen. Given the technology for shooting down satellites has been around since the Cold War, it is hard to see the technological imperative for countries such as China to conduct such tests. While Beijing may have made a political statement (for good or bad) with its 2007 test, if it remains committed to the peaceful use of space then it is hard to understand the advantage of shooting down further satellites. Indeed, with the U.S made Vanguard 1 still in orbit since launch in 1958, one has to wonder why China feels compelled to shoot down satellites that are several decades younger. The debris caused by such tests is a major risk for other space users and given its potential to upset the prospects for a space weapons treaty, it seems evident that China should refrain from further anti-satellite launches . Gonzaga Debate Institute 2011 194 Mercury Politics Weapons – Popular – Congress (2/2) Bipartisan support for space weapons Roque, Congressnow staff writer, 8 [Ashley, 3-11-8, “Some Senate Democrats open to putting weapons in space,” published at rollcall.com, LexisNexis, Accessed June 20th 2011, LGK] Some Senate Democrats are signaling they may support reversing their party's long-standing opposition to putting weapons in space. Senate Appropriations Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) told reporters today Congress should consider permitting the Pentagon to field weapons in space, especially in light of the separate Chinese and U.S. shoot down of their respective satellites. He added he is prepared to engage in a debate over sending weapons into space, as his panel drafts its fiscal 2009 Defense spending bill. Senate Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee Chairman Bi...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/14/2013 for the course POL 090 taught by Professor Framer during the Spring '13 term at Shimer.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online