This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: n "could save 10 percent of our fuel burn — 1 million barrels of jet fuel a year."
At $3 per gallon, that's a chunk of change. But aviation consultant Mike Boyd, president of Evergreen-based Boyd
International, isn't sold. He referred to the NextGen program as "a rudderless vapor hole sucking up tax dollars." Boyd
questions the FAA's progress on NextGen, pointing to flight delays that are relatively unchanged over the past three years
despite money being spent on the modernization. 28 Oil DDW 2012 1 29
Last printed 9/4/2009 7:00:00 PM Oil DDW 2012 1 Link – HSR 30 Oil DDW 2012 1 High speed rail is critical to transition to a post-oil world that trades-off with
Perl, Director, Urban Studies Program, Simon Fraser University, 10
Anthony Perl, Director, Urban Studies Program, Simon Fraser University, 6-11-10, [“Reducing U.S. Oil Consumption,” Council on
Foreign Relations, http://www.cfr.org/energyenvironment/reducing-us-oil-consumption/p22413] E. Liu
America's biggest oil spill has shown us the dark side of pushing the search for oil beyond the frontier of our experience.
Going forward, we face a crucial choice that will have profound consequences for America's future. We can either reinvent
our energy infrastructure to obtain extreme oil more safely or we can reposition our society to use much less of it. Both
options will cost more than Americans have grown accustomed to paying for energy, but the end of cheap oil is inevitable.
A key difference between redesigning our transportation system to enable post-carbon mobility and introducing
infrastructure to bring us more extreme oil--like the Gulf of Mexico's deepwater reserves--can be found in the state of
technology. Moving people and freight without oil can be done with mature technology. Conversely, the technology to
safely produce extreme oil on a large scale remains to be perfected, as events in the Gulf have made obvious. High-speed
trains have revolutionized the way that people move between cities hundreds of miles apart. These trains are powered by
electricity--the ideal medium to facilitate a transition away from oil because it can blend energy sources and thus shift from
non-renewable carbon based fuels like coal and natural gas to renewable sources like solar, wind, and water as soon as the
infrastructure to generate them can be built. These trains are powered by electricity--the ideal medium to facilitate a
transition away from oil because it can blend energy sources, and thus shift from non-renewable carbon-based fuels. In
"Transport Revolutions," Richard Gilbert and I illustrated one scenario whereby the United States could reduce oil-powered
transportation by 40 percent between 2010 and 2025 while obtaining roughly the same levels of ton-miles in freight
transportation and passenger-miles in local and intercity travel. Around half of today's car travel would shift to electric
propulsion, mostly aboard local buses and trains, while about one-third of domestic flying would be substituted by electric
trains, mostly running at 125 miles per hour or faster. Electric cars also would play a modest, but growing role in providing
local mobility. Similar shifts would occur in freight transportation...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/30/2013 for the course ECON 101 taught by Professor Burke during the Spring '13 term at Southern Arkansas University.
- Spring '13
- The American, Saudi Arabia, Peak oil, Nuclear weapon, Oil prices