But in order to present this view i will have to turn

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: son why he is able to openly pose the question that Tamir avoids, that of rightness of dying for the state, and indeed conciders it to be of central importance, lies in the fact that he take a very different view of the concept of the ground project than Williams does. But in order to present this view, I will have to turn to Macintyre’s critique of Williams’ internalism. Since both strands seem to be pointing in the same direction, I will proceed with my argument by reviwing Williams’ account of internal and external reasons, and Macintyre’s critique of this account. Conviniently, Williams ilustrates his argument with an example CEU eTD Collection which seems to be taylor-made for our discussion, that of Owen Wingrave, the hero of Henry James’ story of the same name. I will retain the example, and also use give a hypothetical Macintyrian account of it. Afterwards I will reflect on the significance and consequences that these two accounts for the problem of dying for the liberal state. In his text on internal and external reasons, Bernard Williams suggests a provisional distinction between the two, only to conclude that external reasons as such cannot really exist – either they are “disguised” internal reasons, or they are no reasons at all. To illustrate his 20 Bernard Williams, “Persons, characters, morality”, in Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 13. 13 point, Williams uses a literary example – Henry James’ story “Owen Wingrave”, about a young man who declines to pursue a military career despite his family’s military tradition. Alasdair Macintyre criticizes Williams’ conclusion on several counts, and suggests the distinction between internal and external reasons should be redrawn in such a way that both types of reasons should still be meaningful, while the transition of the latter into the former should be made clearer. Macintyre especially insists on the role of social mediation in this transition from purely external to internal reasons. I will begin with a short summary of James’ story; then I will proceed with an exposition of Williams’ arguments, and the way that he uses the Wingrave example to illustrate it; then I will pass on to Macintyre’s critique of Williams, and in the end I will offer a Macintyrian account of the Owen Wingrave example and offer arguments for its advantage over Williams’ model. 2.1 WILLIAMS ON INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL REASONS Owen Wingrave, the hero of James’ story of the same title, is a young man who comes from a family with a long and distinguished military tradition. All of his male predecessors have dedicated their lives (and many have lost them, too) to the military profession. It is CEU eTD Collection expected that he will follow in their footsteps and become an officer himself. However, he declines to do that. At the very beginning of the story he announces to his family and friends that he has no intention to pursue a military career, and moreover that he considers the military trade as such to be immoral and even “criminal”. The plot of the story revolves around the attempts of Owen’s family to dissuade him of his intentions and bring hi...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online