We see this perhaps most clearly in the proclamation

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ainst the Phaeton, which was armed with fifty cannon, and the attack was delayed. Meanwhile, after a few days, the Phaeton, having seized 232 Heterodox Trends and interrogated the Dutch merchants and having demanded and received supplies from the Japanese, departed. It was a brief incident, but it greatly shocked the shogunate and contributed to the mounting xenophobia among shogunate officials and others. We observed at the beginning of the last chapter that the seclusion policy implemented by the shogunate in the seventeenth century, although it greatly reduced Japan’s foreign contacts, was not intended, so far as we can judge, to make Japan a permanently “closed country.” But shogunate leaders at the end of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth, faced with a new and potentially very dangerous threat from abroad, chose to regard seclusion as the fixed law of the Tokugawa state, even calling Japan sakoku (literally, “chained country”), a term first used in 1801.20 To enforce sakoku, the shogunate in 1825 went so far as to declare a policy of “Don’t Think Twice” (ninen naku) toward unwanted foreigners. If foreigners (meaning Westerners other than the Dutch) should enter Japanese waters or land on Japanese soil, they were to be driven away forthwith. In that same year, 1825, a scholar of the Mito school, Aizawa Seishisai (1781–1863), published a book, entitled New Proposals (Shinron), that became one of the most influential political writings of its time. The Mito school, as noted earlier in this chapter, had been established by the Mito han in the seventeenth century to undertake the research for and writing of The History of Great Japan, a lengthy chronicle of Japan covering the period from 660 b.c. to 1392 that focused on the imperial succession. Called the “later Mito scholars” to distinguish them from the early Mito scholars who first undertook work on The History of Great Japan, Seishisai and his contemporaries of the Mito school concocted a potent ideology, articulated in New Proposals, that they advanced to deal with the foreign threat that then confronted Japan. The basis of this ideology, which was much in...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/08/2013 for the course ANTH 142 taught by Professor Hans during the Spring '13 term at The University of British Columbia.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online