Venturesome Capital- State Charter School Finance Systems

For the most part standards developed by the

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: counting profession should govern the conduct of audits. TABLE 18 Independent Financial Auditing of Charter Schools Separate Audit 1 Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas Part of School District Audit 2 Alaska, California, Colorado,2 Georgia, Hawaii, Kansas, Louisiana,3 New Mexico, Wisconsin 1 Milwaukee Only state-authorized charter schools must provide audit. 2 Not Required Independent audit can be negotiated in charter. 3 State-authorized charter schools must have separate audits. Independent audits have at least three objectives: § Financial statements. Present the school’s financial position (assets and liabilities) and results of operations (revenue and expenditures) at the end of the fiscal year. § Internal control system. Assess the school’s implementation of internal controls (e.g., who can sign checks) for authorizing financial transactions and safeguarding assets. § Compliance. Determine the school’s compliance with applicable laws, regulations, administrative rules and guidelines governing the school. Audits usually present revenues and expenditures in a highly aggregated form. In Florida for example, audits of charter schools conducted by the state’s auditor general aggregate all federal funds, so it is impossible, for example, to distinguish start-up funds from Title I funds. In Massachusetts, one school financial statement presented 75 percent of expenditures in a single line item for its payment to a management company (Boston Renaissance Charter School, 1997). Traditional public schools (and some charter schools) are almost always audited as components of school districts. In this sense, independently audited charter schools are subjected to a higher level of accountability than traditional schools, because they undergo an individual school-level audit. The presentation of 64 Charter School Financial Structure and Accountability independent audits varies greatly from one charter school to another. Lack of detail and/or lack of uniformity seriously limit the usefulness of financial audits for research and policy analysis purposes. Debt An essential financial question is whether charter schools can acquire debt for start-up, cash flow or facilities acquisition. The following discussion focuses on laws, regulations and practices specifically addressing charter school debt. In states with very independent charter schools, however, issues of charter school debt may be determined as much by the laws governing nonprofit corporations as by charter school laws. The table below indicates the states where charter schools are not allowed to go into debt. Many states where school districts award charters—such as California, Colorado and Florida—also allow charter school indebtedness. TABLE 19 Charter School Acquisition of Debt Allowed Not Allowed Hawaii, Kansas, New Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, 1 Mexico, Wisconsin Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts,2 Michigan, Milwaukee, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas 1 The law is silent on this issue, but in practice, short-term borrowing occurs. 2 Horace Mann schools may also acquire debt w...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/11/2013 for the course ECON 101 taught by Professor Smith during the Spring '09 term at Harvard.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online