Venturesome Capital- State Charter School Finance Systems

G minnesota in others a district average eg

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ey share many of the same components. At the heart of these is the base amount of funding for each student enrolled. In some cases, amounts are based on a state average per-pupil expenditure (e.g., Minnesota), in others a district average (e.g., Massachusetts); and in still others the amount is negotiated between charter schools and the authorizing school district (e.g., Colorado). Many states also provide charter schools with additional funding for special education and low-income or at-risk students on the same basis as other public schools. Charter schools are eligible for federal and state categorical program funding to help meet the needs of high-cost students (e.g., students eligible for services under Title I or special education laws) or to promote specific educational programs (e.g., technology literacy or Goals 2000). Finally, the amount and type of fiscal autonomy and financial reporting given to charter schools vary from state to state, as do procedures to monitor financial management and stability. Our report identifies potential financial incentives in state charter school finance systems. Subsequent reports of the National Charter School Finance Study will examine the impact of these incentives. An assessment of the impact of financial incentives on the adequacy 8 Introduction and distribution of resources—as well as educational programs—constitutes an important component of any school finance study. Federal start-up grants, for example, encourage the development of charter schools by providing additional resources. Program requirements attached to federal funding also advance the goals of federal legislation by mandating procedures such as admission to charter schools only by lottery. One could argue that financial incentives would have more impact on market-oriented charter schools than on other public schools. Prospective charter schools are free to develop unique missions and specialized curricula in response to financial incentives. The growing influence of forprofit management companies magnifies the need to pay close attention to financial incentives because that is what market forces are all about. However, the importance of financial incentives should not be overstated. Parents, teachers and community groups create charter schools for specific educational purposes—not to maximize funding. Chartering authorities in many states also give preference to charter schools serving at-risk children, even when no financial incentive exists to serve high-cost children. Chapter 2 of our report reviews previous research on charter school finance. Chapter 3 describes methodology, including the procedures used to create the hypothetical charter schools that provide the basis for funding comparisons in our report. The overview of charter school funding in Chapter 4 includes sections on base per-pupil funding and funding linked to student characteristics or geographic location. Other chapters address start-up funding, facilities funding and transportation funding. Finally, Chapter 9 briefly examines the comparability of charter school and school district funding. Our report also includes a breakdown of the actual dollar amounts that states could provide...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/11/2013 for the course ECON 101 taught by Professor Smith during the Spring '09 term at Harvard.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online