Growing population size would have affected our

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: l have been consequences of swelling population size. Growing population size would have affected our forebears another way, too: by accelerating the pace of evolution. As John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin–Madison has emphasized, more people mean more mutations and opportunities for advantageous mutations to sweep through populations as their members reproduce. This trend may have had an even more striking effect on recent humans than on Upper Paleolithic ones, compounding the dramatic population growth that accompanied the domestication of plants 10,000 years ago. In their 2009 book The 10,000 Year Explosion, Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending, both at the University of Utah, describe multiple gene variants—from those influencing skin color to those that determine tolerance of cow milk—that arose and spread swiftly over the past 10,000 years, thanks to the ever larger numbers of breeding individuals. The relation between adult survivorship and the emergence of sophisticated new cultural traditions, starting with those of the Upper...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/20/2013 for the course ANTH 101 taught by Professor Roseman during the Spring '12 term at University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online