phil of mind paper#3

phil of mind paper#3 - Gable Parigian Phil 100D Varieties...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Gable Parigian Phil 100D 3-13-08 Varieties of Functionalism In beginning the discussion between the main differences of Functionalism and Psychofunctionalism I must explain why these theories were created. They were created to show that a given system can have a mental state without being circular and the only way to do this was to “Ramseyfie” a given sentence. Then they would plug in either a folk psychology or an empirical scientifical theory in order to show the theory was correct. And generally speaking this folk psychology is Functionalism and the empirical scientifical theory is Psychofunctionalism. Functionalism is greatly different than that of Psychofunctionalism. Functionalism is grounded in folk psychology and common sense knowledge. This common sense knowledge is just what all people would accept and use to describe ones behavior. Yet, this is where there is a big problem with Functionalism. The meanings of the mental terms are paramount and if one person thinks some term is different than what another person thinks it is than the whole thing is wrong. It’s just that the meaning of the theory is tied so close to its words that it’s hard for it to always work correctly. For example, one philosopher could think pain is (x) and another could think it’s (2x) so, there’s just no way the given theory could hold due to two even slightly different opinions. Furthermore, Functionalism is a very liberal view; liberal meaning it counts too many things as mental states. It does this for qualitative states, things such as pains and itches, and propositional attitudes, things such as beliefs and desires. Plus, Functionalism is bound to specify inputs and outputs like behaviorism. For a human they could be inputs such as sounds and light and outputs like the moving of arms. Obviously, a snake doesn’t have arms but, I won’t explain this any further as it doesn’t concern our main goal in this paper.
Image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Psychofunctionalism on the other hand plugs in an empirical scientifical theory. This scientifical theory is something that is not obvious to everyone in the world. And it could even be
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern