GeoFinal Notes-- FDI - Final Examination Review Notes D....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Final Examination Review Notes D. Foreign direct investment 1. What is anomalous about Japanese foreign direct investment flows?   The Japanese anomaly.   Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, Japan needed to industrialize quickly  in order to maintain its independence during the age of colonialism.  Its strategy was a close link between the  government and the zaibatsu, large industrial organizations that were the predecessors to today’s keiretsu.  The  government ensured high profits to the zaibatsu by excluding foreign competition, by allowing the zaibatsu to  cartelize, to collude with each other to divide up the cartelize the Japanese market, charging high prices in this  uncompetitive atmosphere, by preventing unionization and so keeping wages low.  The zaibatsu reinvested the  resulting high profits in their businesses, permitting rapid industrial growth.  The price was paid by consumers,  faced with high prices and low wages; they were partially compensated for this by low unemployment levels and  very high job security. You can see some of this at work when you compare Japanese inward and outward FDI flows with those  of the rest of the developed world.  Consider the following table: USA France Germany Sweden Britain Japan Outward 610.1 183.3 199.7 51.2 281.2 284.3 Inward 504.4 142.3 125.0 19.1 214.2 17.8 Table 9.1:  Outward vs. Inward FDI flows, in $ bn (1994) This chart shows two things.  First, in every case the developed countries send more FDI abroad than  they receive.  This makes sense: all countries receive investments but large parts of the world, including much of  developing Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and Africa, generate very little capital to send to other  countries.  The fact that there are relatively few capital exporters means that the capital exporters send more  abroad than they take in.     At the same time, the balance between the inward and outward flows is not totally disproportionate.  In  the US, the ratio between outward and inward FDI flows is six to five; in France, nine to seven; in Germany,  eight to five; in Britain, four to three.  In Europe, only Sweden, much the smallest country, shows a very  significant imbalance, of five to two.  But when you get to Japan, it’s a completely different story, with a ratio  between outward and inward FDI of 16 to 1 in 1994.  Moreover, so far from wearing away, this imbalance  actually increased over time:  the ratio was five to one in 1960 and nine to one in 1985. 
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/06/2009 for the course GEOG 21 taught by Professor Acker during the Fall '08 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Page1 / 3

GeoFinal Notes-- FDI - Final Examination Review Notes D....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online