commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

Another useful reference is van der stichele and

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Personal income tax VAT Radio-TV Germanspeaking Flemish Region Community and Community 0,2 BrusselsCapital 1 Region CoCOM CoCOF 338,8 213,1 18,0 36,7 - - 19,7 16,3 3,9 3,1 6,4 4,1 0,6 3,9 4.7 11.6 14.2 12,2 1,0 4,5 6,8 9,7 7,9 2,1 4,3 4,3 4. Total 184.8 241,8 4,7 629,4 60,6 2,1 8,6 5. Expenditures 194.5 246,3 4,8 619,5 65,9 2,1 8,8 6. Balance -9.7 -4,5 -0,1 Two-Community Commission, 2 French Community Commission (1999 figures). Source: Ministry of Finances, Bulletin de Documentation, Annexe Statistique – 2000 edition. (1 Є = BEF 40,3399) +9,9 -5,3 0,0 2 -0,2 1 22 The mechanism is, in reality, more complex since a transitional correction had to be introduced to reflect that French-language education initially represented not 42.45% but 43.51% of the cumulative expenditures of Dutch- and French-language education (see Spinoy (1998)). 187 Commission on Fiscal Imbalance 4.3. The spring 2001 agreements The so-called Lambermont or Saint-Polycarpe agreements, reflected in legislative terms in the special law of July 13, 2001 transferring various fields of jurisdiction to the Regions and the Communities and the special law of July 13, 2001 respecting the refinancing of the Communities and the extension of the fiscal jurisdiction of the Regions, extended regional jurisdiction, especially in the realms of agriculture, foreign trade and authority over local powers, broadened the means of the Communities23 (means that were increased, indexed to inflation and, starting in 2007, partially to growth, and the apportionment of which between the French Community and the Flemish Community will, from now on, depend not only on the number of students but also on personal income tax revenues) and the Regions, especially with regard to the latter, through the attribution of broader fiscal autonomy. With reference to Valenduc (2002) and the legislation, we can reexamine the fate of personal taxes and personal income tax. Another useful reference is Van der Stichele and Verdonck (2001). First, the fate of the Communities demands brief examination. The additional means attributed (assuming a constant 3% inflation, a 2% real growth and stability in the proportion of young people in the population under the age of 18) would rise, according to my calculations, from 8 billion BEF (0.20 billion €) in 2002 to almost 123 billion BEF (3.05 billion €) in 2012, i.e. an increase in means of 2% at the beginning of the period to 23% at the end of the period. However, these additional means will be gradually apportioned more extensively according to the so-called principle of fair return, i.e. to personal income tax revenues, 80% of Brussels’ revenues being allocated to the French Community and 20% to the Flemish Community. This will mean a reduction in the distribution of means based on needs (supposed to be in line with the number of students). The French Community accounts for 43% of students but only roughly 36% of tax revenues and its share of the additional means would decline from 40% to 36% in 10 years and its share of overall VAT financing, from 42.8% to 41.6%. It should be noted that the personal income tax por...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/06/2013 for the course ECON 220 taught by Professor Paulo during the Spring '13 term at University of Liverpool.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online