commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

Commonwealth grants commission 19992 135 commission on

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: level of public services are higher than in other States. Revenue disabilities arise from inter-State differences in per capita taxable capacities. Essentially a State’s taxable capacity is determined by its level and distribution of income and by its resource endowments. The higher are average incomes, the greater will be the State’s capacity to raise revenue from taxes on payrolls, financial transactions, property, gambling, motor vehicle ownership and operation, and insurance. Thus States with lower per capita incomes will almost certainly have lower taxable capacities (although the Commonwealth Grants Commission does not calculate taxable capacities in this way). A disadvantaged State is likely to face a combination of relatively high per capita costs for the provision of a given level of public services and a relatively low ability to raise the tax revenue necessary to finance these services. The function of the Commonwealth Grants Commission (CGC) is to recommend the process by which such horizontal fiscal imbalance can be corrected. The terms of reference of the CGC’s most recent report on general grant relativities were as follows: The Commission’s assessment should: a) b) be based on the application of the principle that the respective general revenue grants and hospital funding grants to which the States are entitled should enable each State to provide the average standard of State-type public services assuming it does so at an average level of operational efficiency and makes the average effort to raise revenue from its own sources; take account of: i) differences in the capacities of the States to raise revenues; and ii) differences in the amounts required to be spent by the States in providing an average standard of government services. (Commonwealth Grants Commission, 1999:2) 135 Commission on Fiscal Imbalance The Commission interprets its terms of reference in the following way: To enable a claimant State to function at a standard not appreciably below that of other States without having to levy taxation and other charges of greater severity than those in other States, its revenue needs to be supplemented because of: a) its lower capacity to raise taxes and other revenues; and b) its need to incur higher costs in order to provide comparable government services. (Ibid.). It is important to note that the CGC operates on the principle of equalisation of fiscal capacity. States are to be put into the position of having the ability to provide average levels of public services while imposing taxes of only average severity. There is no requirement for any individual State actually to provide average levels of public service while imposing average tax burdens. Such a system would be one of fiscal performance equalisation and would imply that Federal grants became tied grants, with the Commonwealth Government determining how those grants were to be spent. Performance equalisation would imply that the claimed major advantage of federal systems – the ability to cater for inter-State differences in tastes and preferences - would be lost. Capacity equalisation means that States can choose whether to adopt high spending/high taxing policies or low spending/low taxing policies. There are essentially two sets of calculations in the CGC model – cost disabilities and tax...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online