commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

Financial equalization between the basic authorities

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: s a reasonable and convenient approximation of the scale of consumption by residents of local public services (most econometric studies confirm that consumption income elasticity approaches 1, Guengant, 1988). The business tax would be maintained but its base would be reformed and now coincide with added value assessed at factor cost and at the place of production. Next, the overhauling of local taxation depends on the principle of fiscal specialization. “Marginal” specialization would be adopted. The tax resources of each level of authority would continue to depend on various taxes (equalization of basic risks) but the capacity to increase or decrease the rates on a given tax would be granted to only one category of authority. This “marginal fiscal specialization” would thus combine the advantages of the security provided by a composite fiscal resource and that of democratic transparency. 237 Commission on Fiscal Imbalance The establishment of a rate tunnel is intended to temper the (non-cooperative) strategic use that certain local authorities would be tempted to make of the taxation weapon. The rate tunnels are narrower if the elasticity of the localized base to the tax rate is high and if these bases are narrow in relation to the expenditures to be financed. They are all the more readily accepted when, at the outset, the modernization of the tax bases has made it possible to further harmonize the rates within the territory, especially as regards the business tax and the developed property tax of businesses. The reform introduces the decoupling of local taxation (communes and intercommunal groups) and the taxation of intermediate authorities (departments and regions), a solution that should facilitate the reorganization, indeed the possible elimination, of one level of intermediate authority. When these principles are combined, local taxation would be reorganized as indicated below. ♦ The communes would set property tax rates and also benefit from a broad-based, local income tax, but at a moderate set rate. ♦ At the intercommunal level, the single business tax applicable to an urban area would become widespread. Fiscal coordination between communes and intercommunal groups would be achieved, first of all, by means of a legal relationship centred on the covariation of household and business rates. Second, a decisive institutional reform would round out the French territorial reform that has been under way for half a century. Democratic legitimacy and most local jurisdictions would be transferred to the intercommunal level, which would have a deliberative assembly elected by direct universal suffrage; municipal councils, which would continue to be elected by direct suffrage, would become components of community political organization. The ceiling and the vertical link between the rates would be maintained in respect of the business tax. The linkage between household and business taxation would guarantee the coordination of communal and intercommunal fiscal strate...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/06/2013 for the course ECON 220 taught by Professor Paulo during the Spring '13 term at University of Liverpool.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online