commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

If necessary it requires constitutional or statutory

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ent of public functions from the central government and its agencies to subnational governments. Taking advantage of their capacity to tailor services to the needs and preferences of communities, subnational governments are in a good position to provide public services whose benefits are localized. Devolution of resources and decision-making power is expected to result in improvement in the life quality of the population. Power can be transferred on three fronts: political, administrative, and fiscal. Although each type of decentralization has different characteristics, system outcomes, and policy implications, the expected impact in each of them is an improvement in the life quality of the population (see Figure 8). Ideally, this is the case for a good decentralization practice that is people oriented. While distinguishing among different types of decentralization is useful for highlighting its many dimensions, it is impossible to disentangle the inter-linkages between these three concepts. Political decentralization aims to give citizens and their elected representatives more power in public decision-making. The concept implies transfer of policy and legislative power to citizens and their democratically elected representatives at the local level. Political decentralization is often associated with pluralistic politics and representative government. If necessary, it requires constitutional or statutory reforms, development of pluralistic political parties, strengthening of legislatures, and creation of local political 16 units and encouragement of effective public interest groups. Administrative decentralization seeks to redistribute authority, responsibility, and financial resources among different levels of government (Rondinelli, 1999). Administrative decentralization can be done in two different ways: functional and areal distribution of power (Rondinelli, 1981). Functional distribution is the transfer of authority to specialized organizations that operate across jurisdictions. An example of functional distribution is creation of field offices within national ministries dealing with health care, education, and transportation issues. Areal distribution of power aims to transfer of responsibility for public functions to institutions within specified geographical and political boundaries. Usually, areal distribution of power is to a subnational government - a province, district, or municipality. In administrative distribution of power, an essential distinction with important implications on intergovernmental relations system is the form of decentralization: deconcentration, delegation, and devolution. 1. Deconcentration involves the shifting of responsibilities from central government agencies located in the capital city to regional offices. Rondinelli (1981) defines deconcentration as local administrations in which all subordinate levels of government within a country are agents of the central authority either appointed by or are responsible directly to ce...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/06/2013 for the course ECON 220 taught by Professor Paulo during the Spring '13 term at University of Liverpool.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online