commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

In addition to taking into account contributions to

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: an estimate of the margins available to the federal government in future years. Such estimates have been made assuming that the taxation system does not change and without taking into account an eventual increase in the contributions of the member States to the financing of the European Union, for example following the expansion of the EU. To ensure that the federal government does not bear alone the cost of an increase in contributions to the EU, the Sainte-Thérèse agreement makes provision for taking into consideration this factor in determining growth in the financial resources of the communities. During negotiations leading to the Lambermont agreement, it was advisable, therefore, to convert into figures this political intention included in the Sainte-Thérèse agreement. This question, one of the vaguest in the Sainte-Thérèse agreement, was subject to lengthy debate. Tension between the federal government and the communities overall was palpable. No entity wanted to renegotiate the matter each year. However, the establishment of a fixed criterion risked proving unfavourable to one level of government or the other. Annual change in the amounts equivalent to 91% of growth in GNI was finally adopted, based on anticipated contributions, bearing in mind the higher cost expected in the wake of the broadening of the European Union. 25 26 27 A political agreement was reached in October 2000 (Ste Thérèse agreement) and its legal translation was made in January 2001 (Lambermont agreement). Differences exist between those two steps. The notion of gross domestic product has been replaced by that of gross national income in conjunction with the harmonization of national accounts in Europe (SEC 95). The same allocative criterion is applied to the personal income tax transfer earmarked for the regions, based on the derivation principle of taxation. 201 Commission on Fiscal Imbalance This final solution offers three advantages. First, it gives the communities the ability to forecast their revenues. Next, it protects them against possible changes in agreements with the EU, in respect of which the communities are not consulted. Furthermore, they are a stabilizing factor in respect of federal government spending since, when the increase in its contributions to the EU is less than what it gains through the 91% link to growth in GNI, it may constitute reserves and draw on them when the increase in its contributions exceeds this amount. In addition to taking into account contributions to the European Union, the Sainte-Thérèse agreement stipulated that the adjustment to growth would take into account change in the federal government’s real revenues. This arrangement would have made the communities overly dependent on the reductions in federal fiscal pressure anticipated in subsequent years. In this hypothetical situation, the finances of one level of government would have been wholly at the mercy of decisions made by another level of government. Furthermore, the federal government would have benefited, at least from a political standpoint, from a tax reform, while the cost of such a reform would have been shared by...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online