commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

President george bush proposed a sweeping program of

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: sed use of direct orders, many in the 1980s and often without funding, further raised the ire of state and local officials. Examples here included the Americans with Disabilities Act, Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments, the Water Quality Act, and the Brady Bill. Estimates of the financial impact of these unfunded mandates continued to rise. 3.1. Explicit Decentralization Several presidents, with varying success, tried to respond to these concerns. President Reagan was somewhat successful in reducing the number of rules and regulations relating to grants, although it proved to be a modest success. President George Bush proposed a sweeping program of federal government program “turnbacks” in an attempt to rerationalize the federal grant system, but was unsuccessful. President Clinton’s administration increased the use of “waivers” in programs like welfare to allow the states to experiment. But it was the election of a Republican majority to Congress in 1994 that was to produce the two trophies of recent decentralization. Republicans who ran for the House of Representatives in 1994 put together a list of policy goals called “the Contract with America.” The first item on the list to be passed was 1995’s Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), seemingly responding to the vociferous objections of state and local officials. The law allowed any member of Congress to raise a point of order on the floor to stop any proposed legislation that involved an uncompensated state or local cost greater than $50 million a year.21 While the bill received a lot of publicity and seemed to stem the tide of uncompensated federal government intrusion, it was not as significant as some thought. Most importantly it was made prospective, thereby removing none of the onerous orders already in place. Further, a simple majority can override the point of order. There are exemptions, including those regulations relating to discrimination, grant conditions, preemptions, or provision of services hot having state or local fiscal implications. Paul Posner has found that the law’s enactment slowed the number of new mandates, 22 but still allowed Congress to enact intrusive grant conditions and preemptions in the years following. Posner has noted that Congress in some instances merely reduced the estimate of the mandate’s cost to bring it under the $50 million threshold, and in other cases has produced a consensus that the point of order should be overruled, such as under Megan’s Law on the registration of sexual offenders. 19 20 21 22 28 See Bruce A. Wallin, From Revenue Sharing to Deficit Sharing: General Revenue Sharing and Cities (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1998). See National League of Cities vs. Usery (1976). See Paul Posner, The Politics of Unfunded Mandates (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1998). Ibid. Commission on Fiscal Imbalance The most noteworthy Congressional enactment involving decentralization has been welfare reform, or passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996. While a long overdue reform...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/06/2013 for the course ECON 220 taught by Professor Paulo during the Spring '13 term at University of Liverpool.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online