commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

Robert ebel sums it up well in the last two decades

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: undergoing significant territorial decentralization (Italy, the United Kingdom and Spain), and even proceeding with a formal decentralization of jurisdictions (Belgium). This is indicative of stable or growing public needs in the fields of jurisdiction of the federated states and a willingness to bring public bodies and citizens closer together. Robert Ebel sums it up well: In the last two decades there has been a worldwide interest in decentralization of government in all parts of the world. The pursuit of decentralization is widespread, as both developed and developing countries attempt to challenge central governments’ monopoly of decision-making power (p. 145). Another interesting fact is that federated states are playing an active and formal role in intergovernmental fiscal relations in many of these federations. The participation of federated states in the definition, review and operation of these relations is so important that reforms of intergovernmental fiscal arrangements are made unanimously or under special majority rules that require the support of the various partners of the federation. In addition, in almost every case, it is stipulated that the reforms adopted (Australia, Germany and Belgium) or under study (Switzerland) will have positive financial consequences for all the federated states. Also, in the federations studied, the revision and operating details of transfer programs are, in general, governed by a set of rules that contribute to reduce the scope for arbitrary action by the central government in the determination of envelopes. The operating rules that govern these programs also encourage, in some cases, improved predictability of funding, in particular through indexation rules or by tying funding to certain variables (the yield of a tax, for instance) whose growth can be forecast. Lastly, we are convinced, from reading these texts, that there is wide diversity in how the federations considered deal with the issue of intergovernmental fiscal relations. These countries have developed fiscal arrangements that meet their specific needs and they adopt reforms to adapt them to new conditions. Reforms of fiscal arrangements in these countries are the culmination of political negotiations that are certainly difficult, but ratified by all in the end. This is not surprising. Intergovernmental fiscal arrangements are the “expression of the federal principle” (Otto Beierl, p. 55), i.e. they must result from negotiations between orders of government on an equal footing and always aim at achieving a better sharing of the financial resources within the federation. 12 Commission on Fiscal Imbalance REFERENCES Texts for the Symposium that was scheduled to take place on September 13 and 14, 2001: BEIERL, Otto, “Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Germany: The Bavarian Point of View.” COLLINS, David J., “The 2000 Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements in Australia.” DAFFLON , Bernard, “Fiscal Federalism in Switze...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/06/2013 for the course ECON 220 taught by Professor Paulo during the Spring '13 term at University of Liverpool.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online