commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

The french version of the agreement was worded

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: concern the regions. Nevertheless, everyone being around the table, the Flemish negotiators took the opportunity to express their demand of increased fiscal autonomy32. The agreement states in its fourth part: “a lump sum linear reduction of 3.2 billion BEF for 2000 on income tax is compatible with the special financing act and is not likely to threaten the economic and monetary union.” [our translation] On June 18, 2000, the Flemish government approved in first reading a draft decree respecting a 2500-BEF tax reduction for all taxpayers in respect of 2001 (the Dewael decree). Under the procedure imposed by section 9 of the special financing act, the consultative committee comprising the three regional executives and the federal government met in July in order to issue an opinion on this decree, at which time some shortcomings of the special financing act were brought to light. In effect, some imprecisions led to diverging political claims. This explains why the consultative committee failed to adopt a clear position and why only a political agreement such as the Sainte-Thérèse agreement finally put an end to the debate. The main reasons why diverging political claims appeared is, first, that interpretations of the Saint-Éloi agreement differed. The box below reveals the origin of the polemic. This provision should have eliminated any problem concerning the interpretation of section 9 of the special financing act and, while a text had been signed, the French and Flemish translations could be interpreted differently. 31 32 204 This is the definition of a joint tax, section 6, §2, special financing act. See Henry, Filleul and Pagano (2000).For a complete description of the Saint-Éloi agreement, see J. HENRY, G. FILLEUL et G. PAGANO (2000), « L’accord institutionnel dit de la Saint-Éloi », Courrier hebdomadaire, CRISP, n°1696, Bruxelles. Commission on Fiscal Imbalance French text Le Comité de concertation est d’avis qu’une réduction linéaire forfaitaire de 3,2 milliards pour l’année 2000 sur l’impôt sur le revenu est compatible avec la LSF et n’est pas de nature à mettre en danger l’union économique et monétaire. Dutch text Het overleg comité is van oordeel dat lineaire, forfaitaire kortingen voor een globaal bedrag van 3,2 mld voor het jaar 2000 op de inkomstenbelasting volledig vallen binnen het toepassingsgebied van de huidige financieringswet en niet van aard zijn de economische en monetaire unie in gevaar te brengen. The French version of the agreement was worded ambiguously. French-speakers interpreted it as an authorization for the regions to grant a linear tax reduction, i.e. proportionally identical for all taxpayers, in a total amount of $3.2 billion BEF. This did not modify the progressivity of the tax and was, therefore, compatible with the special financing act. As for the Flemish parties, this agreement authorized the regions to grant lump sum and linear tax reductions (in the Dutch text the words are in the plural), i.e. identical for all taxpayers, which modified the progressivity of the tax since the lump sum reductions were proportionally of greater...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/06/2013 for the course ECON 220 taught by Professor Paulo during the Spring '13 term at University of Liverpool.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online