{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

This leisurely approach is indicative of contrasting

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: in concerning the UK’s conformity with the EU Stability and Growth Pact (which applies to the United Kingdom even though it is not a member of the Euro). The deficits and debt of subnational governments are scored within the general government measures monitored by Ecofin. This manifests itself in unresolved tensions in public attitudes to centralization. First, territorial variation in cash benefits is deemed intolerable, even when strong cases could be made in terms of regional variations in the cost of living. Second, though centralized bureaucracies are viewed as suspect, attempts to decentralize public sector decision-making (eg purchaser-provider separation in health, with local determination of some priorities) quickly face bitter complaints about ‘postcode lotteries’. Paradoxically, if devolution brings greater transparency about in-kind provision, this might revive pressures for uniform provision. Commission on Fiscal Imbalance 6. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, four final observations will be made. Firstly, it is essential to recognize where the UK devolved system of government is coming from and not to criticize it on the grounds that it would not have been invented in that form had there been a clean slate. Devolved government in Scotland and Wales is only two years old and the restoration of devolved government in Northern Ireland, itself two years old, suffered a 24-hour suspension on 10 August 2001 for reasons unconnected with the subject matter of this paper. The start has undoubtedly been shaky, but the show is on the road. Secondly, the conceptual framework of the economic theory of fiscal federalism is most helpful in constructing an analysis of a particular country in terms which resonate elsewhere. However, prescription ought to proceed with great caution. The mainstream literature on fiscal federalism has a strongly normative orientation, relating to the optimal tiering and spatial design of government. Much of its development predated the influence of public choice theorists, a factor which probably explains the relatively optimistic view of government characteristic of this tradition. Clearly, those who start with a Leviathan model of government are likely to reach different conclusions from those making more benevolent assumptions. Moreover, the trade-offs between efficiency, equity and broader political considerations (such as sustaining territorial integrity) will crucially depend on context. In some cases, the units of a devolved or federal structure are themselves open to negotiation, in others they are historically and culturally determined. Similarly, traditions about the extent of fiscal equalization can be deeply embedded. Thirdly, one possible line of constitutional development would see Wales and Northern Ireland converge on the Scotland model, at the same time as the Scottish Parliament sought to expand its fiscal power. By far the greatest uncertainties attach to developments in England, where the Labour Gove...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online