commission on fiscal imbalance 合集

This observation is especially true for the brussels

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: o be balanced in respect of the different entities concerned? What is the state of Belgian federalism in the wake of this new round of negotiations? What does the future hold in store? The unrefined vision of the agreements, which often arises in discussion and the media, takes the form of a simple fair’s fair: the Flemish region is obtaining its keenly sought fiscal autonomy and, in exchange, the French-speaking community is receiving sufficient funds to get it out of the red. Our analysis enables us to be more nuanced and to put into perspective the refinancing of the two communities, accompanied by a loss of intercommunity solidarity, and broader fiscal autonomy for the three regions. Legislators have sought to clearly delineate this new autonomy, e.g. through the introduction of margins in respect of personal income tax, the redefinition of criteria governing the localization of taxes that engender a significant risk of delocalization, and the cooperation agreements required with regard to taxes centred on mobile tax bases. These measures were essential given that the amounts that the Flemish community is gaining through the community refinancing mechanism (and which 72 it said it did not need) is largely allowing it to finance a reduction in its fiscal pressure. These guidelines should limit the risk of harmful effects of fiscal competition. It can thus be said that French-speakers’ demands have been met, but have been limited by the proportional reduction in intercommunity solidarity measures. Similarly, Flemish demands have been met, but have been limited by the measures aimed at reducing the detrimental effects of tax competition. Moreover, autonomy with respect to personal income tax refunds may not be deemed to be a major gain since such autonomy was acquired in 1989. It is the form of the guidelines that has been changed: instead of a limitation in terms of interregional cooperation, the limitation now focuses on margins. In our view, the agreement is balanced from the standpoint of the two entities that requested the reform. We are less positive about the Walloon and Brussels regions, which have been swept along by this reforming movement against their better wishes. Of course, putting the French-speaking community back on an even keel should ultimately prove beneficial, although they are nonetheless facing a budgetary situation that is less stable than it was previously. To take advantage of this new revenue structure, or at least to avoid losing thereby, is a major challenge in the future for these entities. This observation is especially true for the Brussels region, whose revenues are, proportionally, more extensively affected by the reforms. Consequently, the region is more likely to be adversely affected by the non-effectiveness of the safety net. We would like to draw the reader’s attention to the worrisome situation of the Brussels region. Aside from the disadvantage mentioned earlier, Brussels will unquestionably be the region most exposed to t...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online