This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: cooperated in catching the snoop. The bogus e-mail referred to “shrinking travel allowances.”
The suspect took the bait, apparently using a co-worker’s
password to view the e-mail. When he later mentioned the new
travel rules, he was slapped with a reassignment back to Los Angeles, to an as-yet-undesignated job—probably writing obituaries, or so the rumormongers in your office have decided.
The Los Angeles Times has always observed strict discipline
with regard to journalistic ethics. But because journalists traditionally hold confidentiality in high regard, management assumed that e-mail privacy needed no special rules or enforcement
policies. Clearly, that assumption was wrong. In the past, the company casually conveyed a list of commonsense e-mail guidelines
such as not using the system for personal business; being aware
that employee e-mail is not invisible to computer system administrators or even managers; not using derogatory language, obscenity, or copyrighted material; and so on. Now, a strict privacy
policy will be added to...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/24/2013 for the course ECON 830 taught by Professor Shahlasultaova during the Fall '12 term at Khazar University.
- Fall '12