Signal Processing and Linear Systems-B.P.Lathi copy

dependence of frequency response on poles and zeros

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: We for conjugate poles), as depicted in F ig, 7.15b. At t his p oint, t he o ptimum s hape o f this wall is n ot obvious because o ur a rguments a re q ualitative a nd i ntuitive. Yet, i t is c ertain t hat t o h ave enhanced gain ( constant g ain) a t e very frequency over t his r ange, we need a n infinite number of poles o n t his walL We c an show t hat for a maximaJly f iatt r esponse over t he frequency range (0 t o we), t he wall is a semicircle with a n i nfinite n umber o f p oles uniformly d istributed a long t he waJl. 1 I n p ractice, we c ompromise by using a finite n umber (n) o f poles w ith l ess-than-ideal characteristics. Figure 7.15c shows t he p ole configuration for a fifth-order (n = 5) filter. T he a mplitude r esponse for various values o f n a re i llustrated i n Fig. 7.15d. As n - ; 0 0, t he filter response approaches t he ideal. T his family o f filters is known as t he B utterworth filters. T here a re also o ther families. I n C hebyshev filters, t he waJl s hape is a semiellipse r ather t han a semicircle. T he c haracteristics of a Chebyshev filter a re inferior t o t hose of B utterworth over t he p assband (0, we), w here t he c haracteristics show a rippling effect instead of t he m aximally flat response of B utterworth. B ut in t he s topband (w > we), C hebyshev behavior is superior in t he sense t hat C hebyshev filter gain drops faster t han t hat o f t he B utterworth. O Re .... Re .... 1m x .11- ••• ; " (b) (a) 501 ( c) '. x' " '. IH (joo)1 '" 0 t IH(joo)1 t jOOo Re .... .. - jOJ o OlO (a) (b) F ig. 7 .16 Pole-zero configuration and the amplitude response of a bandpass filter. 7 .4-3 o (d) F ig. 7 .15 Pole-zero configuration and the amplitude response of a lowpass (Butterworth) filter. Bandpass Filters T he s haded characteristic in Fig. 7.16b shows t he i deal b andpass filter gain. I n t he b andpass filter, t he g ain is enhanced over t he e ntire passband. O ur e arlier tMaximally flat amplitude response means the first 2 n-l derivatives of I H(jwll are zero a t w = o. 502 7 Frequency Response a nd Analog Filters 503 We use the poles and zeros in Fig. 7.17a with wo = 1207r. The zeros are at s = ± jwo. The two poles are at - wo cos 0 ± jwo sin O. The filter transfer function is (with wo = 1207r) 1m s-plane .)C • ••• 7.4 Filter Design by Placement of Poles a nd Zeros j Wo .. H (s) = 0 2 8 + w5 = 8 2 + (2wo cos O)s + w5 = R e-. + jwo) + Wo cos 0 - jwo sin 0) 2 8 + 142122.3 s2 + (753.98 cos 0)8 + 142122.3 (s - jwo)(s (8 + Wo cos 0 + jwo sin 0)(8 and '. - jro o '''''' (a) IH(jw)1 = o (b) Fig. 7.17 Pole-zero configuration and the amplitude response of a bandstop (notch) filter. discussion indicates t hat t his can be realized by a wall o f poles opposite t he imaginary axis in front of t he p assband centered a t wOo ( There is also a wall of conjugate poles opposite - wo.) Ideally, a n infinite number of poles is required. In practice, we compromise by using a finite number of poles and accepting less-than-...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online