Signal Processing and Linear Systems-B.P.Lathi copy

2 jcontrast this situation with the polynomial

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: rought b efore h im in chains. Napoleon scolded Fourier for his ungrateful behavior b ut r eappointed h im t he p refect of R hone a t Lyons. W ithin four months Napoleon was defeated a t W aterloo, a nd was exiled t o St. Helena, never t o r eturn. 3.4 Trigonometric Fourier Series 189 Fourier once again was in disgrace as a B onapartist, a nd h ad t o p awn his effects t o keep himself alive. B ut t hrough t he i ntercession of a former s tudent, who was now a prefect of Paris, he was a ppointed d irector of t he s tatistical b ureau of t he Seine a p osition t hat allowed him ample t ime for scholarly pursuits. L ater, in 1827, h~ was elected t o t he powerful position of p erpetual s ecretary of t he P aris A cademy of Science, a section of t he i nstitute. 4 W hile serving as t he p refect of Grenoble, Fourier carried on his e laborate investigation of p ropagation of h eat in solid bodies, which led him t o t he F ourier series a nd t he F ourier integral. O n 21 D ecember 1807, h e announced these results in a prize p aper on t he t heory of heat. Fourier claimed t hat a n a rbitrary function (continuous or w ith d iscontinuities) defined in a finite interval by a n a rbitrarily c apricious g raph c an always b e e xpressed as a s um of sinusoids (Fourier series). T he judges, who included t he g reat F rench m athematicians L aplace, Lagrange, Monge, a nd L aCroix a dmitted t he novelty a nd i mportance of Fourier's work, b ut c riticized i t for lack o f m athematical rigor a nd generality. Lagrange t hought i t i ncredible that. a s um o f sines a nd cosines could a dd u p t o a nything b ut a n infinitely differentiable function. Moreover, one of t he p roperties of a n infinitely differentiable function is t hat if we know its behavior over a n a rbitrarily s mall interval, we c an d etermine its behavior over t he e ntire range ( the T aylor-Maclaurin series). Such a f unction is far from a n a rbitrary o r a capriciously d rawn g raph. 5 F ourier t hought t he c riticism u njustified b ut was unable t o prove his claim because t he t ools required for o perations w ith infinite series were n ot available a t t he t ime. However, p osterity h as proved Fourier t o b e closer t o t he t ruth t han his critics. T his is t he classic conflict between pure m athematicians a nd p hysicists or engineers, as we shall see again in t he life of Oliver Heaviside (p. 381). I n 1829 Dirichlet proved Fourier's claim concerning capriciously drawn functions w ith a few restrictions (Dirichlet conditions). Although t hree o f t he four judges were in favor of publication, this p aper was rejected because o f v ehement opposition by Lagrange. Fifteen years later, after several a ttempts a nd d isappointments, Fourier published t he r esults in e xpanded form as a t ext, Theorie analytique de la chaleur, which is now a classic. 3.4 Trigonometric Fourier Series C onsider a signal set: { I, cos wot, cos 2wot, . .. , cos nwot, . .. ; sin wot, sin 2wot, . .. , s in nwot, . .. } (...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/14/2013 for the course ENG 350 taught by Professor Bayliss during the Spring '13 term at Northwestern.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online