Signal Processing and Linear Systems-B.P.Lathi copy

# 4 linear transformation o f s tate vector 815 taking

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: e e xternal t erminals, b ut i ts t ransfer f unction H(8) = is s ilent a bout i t. T he s ystem i n F ig. 13.9a is controllable b ut n ot o bservable, whereas t he s ystem in Fig. 13.9b is observable b ut n ot c ontrollable. T he t ransfer f unction d escription o f a s ystem l ooks a t a s ystem o nly f rom t he i nput a nd o utput t erminals. C onsequently, t he t ransfer d escription c an s pecify o nly t he p art o f t he s ystem w hich is coupled t o t he i nput a nd t he o utput t erminals. F igures 1 3.lOa a nd 1 3.lOb show t hat i n b oth c ases only a p art o f t he s ystem t hat h as a t ransfer f unction H (8) = is c oupled t o t he i nput a nd t he o utput t erminals. T his is t he r eason w hy b oth s ystems h ave t he s ame t ransfer f unction H (8) = 1. T he s tate v ariable d escription ( Eqs. 13.79 a nd 13.82), o n t he o ther h and, c ontains a ll t he i nformation a bout t hese s ystems t o d escribe t hem c ompletely. T he r eason is t hat t he s tate v ariable d escription is a n i nternal d escription, n ot t he e xternal d escription o btained f rom t he s ystem b ehavior a t e xternal t erminals. M athematically, t he r eason t he t ransfer f unction fails t o d escribe t hese s ystems c ompletely is t he f act t hat t heir t ransfer f unction h as a c ommon f actor 8 - 1 i n t he n umerator a nd d enominator; t his c ommon f actor is canceled o ut w ith a c onsequent loss o f t he i nformation a bout t hese s ystems. S uch a s ituation o ccurs w hen a s ystem is uncontrollable a nd/or u nobservable. I f a s ystem is b oth c ontrollable a nd o bservable (which is t he c ase w ith m ost o f t he p ractical s ystems) t he t ransfer f unction d escribes t he s ystem c ompletely. I n s uch a c ase t he i nternal a nd e xternal d escriptions a re e quivalent. S!l S!l a nd (13.84a) (13.84b) S!l T he first row of 13 is zero. Hence t he second mode (corresponding to A l l ) is not controllable. However, since none of t he columns of C vanish, both modes are observable a t the output. Hence the system is observable but not controllable. We reach to the same conclusion by realizing the system with the s tate variables Z l a nd Z 2. T he two s tate equations are z =Az+Bf y =Cz F rom Eqs. (13.83) and (13.84), we have :h = Zl a nd t hus y = Zl + Z2 (13.85) Figure 13.lOb shows a realization of these equations. Clearly, each of t he two modes is observable a t t he o utput, but t he mode corresponding t o Al = 1 is not controllable. • o C omputer E xample C 13.6 Solve Example 13.11 using MATLAB. A =[l 0 ;1 - 1]; B =[l; 0]; C =[l -2]; [V, L ]=eig(A); P =inv(V); 1 3.6 s! S tate-Space Analysis o f D iscrete-Time Systems W e have shown t hat a n n th-order d ifferential e quation c an b e e xpressed i n t erms o f n f irst-order differential equations. I n t he following analogous p rocedure, we s how t hat a n n th-order d ifference e quation c an b e e xpressed in t erms o f n firstorder d ifference e quations. C onsider t he z -transfer f unction (13.86a) a 8 24 13 S tate-Space Analysis 13.6 S...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online