Signal Processing and Linear Systems-B.P.Lathi copy

For this reason i t is c ustomary t o s how t he s

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ; &quot;0- - r=&lt;No&gt; No (10.20) where 1 0.2 Aperiodic Signal representation by Fourier I ntegral I n Sec. 10.1 we succeeded in representing periodic signals as a s um of (everlasting) exponentials. In this section we e xtend this representation t o a periodic signals. T he procedure is identical conceptually t o t hat in C hapter 4 used for continuoustime signals. Applying a limiting process, we now show t hat aperiodic signals I[k] c an be expressed as a continuous sum (integral) of everlasting exponentials. To represent a n aperiodic signal I[k] such as t he one illustrated in Fig. 1O.3a by everlasting exponential signals, let us construct a new periodic signal I No [k] formed b y r epeating t he signal I[k] every No u nits, as shown in Fig. 10.3b. T he p eriod No is made long enough t o avoid overlap between t he r epeating cycles (No 2: 2N + 1). T he periodic signal I No [k] can be represented by a n e xponential Fourier series. I f we l et No --+ 0 0 , t he signal I[k] r epeats after a n infinite interval, a nd therefore lim INo[k] = J[k] N o--too t In t his e xample we have used t he s ame e quations as t hose for O FT i n E xample C5.2, w ith a m inor difference. I n t he p resent e xample, t he v alues o f J[k] a t k = 4 a nd - 4 a re t aken a s 1, whereas in E xample 5.3 t hese values a re 0.5. T his is t he r eason for t he s light difference i n s pectra i n Fig. 1O.2b a nd F ig. 5.16d. Unlike continuous-time signals, discrete-time signals c an h ave n o d iscontinuity. ~ L No Dr = k =-oo 00 I[k]e-jrflok (10.21) T he limits for t he s um o n t he r ight-hand side of Eq. (10.21) should be from - N t o N . B ut because I[k] = 0 for Ikl &gt; N , i t does not m atter if t he limits are taken from - 00 t o 0 0. I t is i nteresting t o see how t he n ature of t he s pectrum changes as No increases. To understand this fascinating behavior, let us define F (n), a continuous function of n, as 00 F (n) = L I[k]e- jflk (10.22) k =-oo From this definition a nd Eq. (10.21), we have Dr = 1 - F(rno) No (10.23) This result shows t hat t he Fourier coefficients D r a re ( l/No) times t he samples o f F (n) t aken every no r ad/s.t Therefore, ( l/No)F(n) is t he envelope for t he coefficients D r. We now let No --+ 0 0 by doubling No repeatedly. Doubling No halves t he f undamental frequency no so t he s pacing between successive spectral components (harmonics) is halved, a nd t here a re now twice as many components (samples) in t For t he sake o f s implicity we assume D r a nd t herefore F (f!) t o b e r eal. T he a rgument, however, is also v alid for complex D r [or F (f!)]. 626 10 Fourier Analysis of Discrete-Time Signals t he s pectrum. At the same time, by doubling No, t he envelope of t he coefficients 'Or is halved, as seen from Eq. (10.23). I f we c ontinue this process o f doubling No repeatedly, t he n umber of components doubles in each step; t he s pectrum progressively becomes denser while its magnitude 'Or becomes smaller. Note, however, t hat t he re...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online