Signal Processing and Linear Systems-B.P.Lathi copy

T he t ransfer f unction is 1222 ji a nd a ccording t

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: tems. I t s hould b e remembered, however, t hat w ith this criterion we a re ensuring only t hat t he t Because T is a c onstant, s ome a uthors ignore t he f actor T , w hich yields a lternate c riterion = h a(kT). I gnoring T m erely scales t he a mplitude response o f t he r esulting filter. h[kJ , 7 34 12 F requency Response a nd D igital Filters d igital filter's response matches exactly t hat of t he d esired analog filter a t s ampling i nstants. I f we w ant t he two responses t o m atch a t e very value o f t , we m ust have T ~ O. T herefore 735 12.5 Recursive F ilter Design: T he I mpulse Invariance m ethod cT c h [ k] (b) (12.37) A Practical Difficulty k- t- B oth o f t hese c riteria for filter design require t he c ondition T ..... 0 for realizing a digital filter equivalent t o a given analog filter. However, this condition is ~mpos~ible .in practice because i t n ecessitates a n i nfinite sampling r ate, r esulting m an mfimte d ata r ate. I n p ractice, we must choose a small b ut n onzero T t o achieve a compromise between t he two conflicting requirements, namely closeness of approximation a nd s ystem cost. T his a pproximation, however, does not m ean t hat t he s ystem in Fig. 12.8a is inferior t o t hat in Fig. 12.8b, because often H a(s) i tself is a n a pproximation t o w hat we a re seeking. For example, in lowpass filter design we strive t o design a s ystem w ith i deal lowpass characteristics. Failing t hat, however, we s ettle for s ome a pproximation such as B utterworth lowpass t ransfer functions. I n fact, i t is entirely possible t hat H[z], which is a n a pproximation t o Ha(s), m ay b e a b etter a pproximation t o t he desired characteristics t han is H a(s) itself. Fig. 1 2.9 Procedure for t he impulse invariance method of filter design. T he i mpulse response h (t) o f t his filter is t he inverse Laplace t ransform o f Ha(s), which in t his case is (12.41b) T he c orresponding digital filter u nit s ample response h[kJ is given by Eq. (12.39) h[kJ = T ha(kT) = Tce kAT (12.42) Figures 12.9a a nd b show h a(t) a nd h[kJ. According t o E q. (12.40), H[zJ is T t imes t he z -transform of h[kJ. T hus, T cz (12.43) H [zJ=-z - eAT 1 2.5 Recursive Filter Design by the T ime-Domain Criterion: T he Impulse Invariance M ethod T he t ime-domain design criterion for t he e quivalence o f t he s ystems in Figs. 12.8a a nd 12.8b is [see Eq. (12.31)J h[kJ = lim T ha(kT) T~O (12.38) where h[kJ is t he u nit impulse response of H[z], ha(t) is t he u nit i mpulse response of Ha(s), a nd T is t he s ampling interval in Fig. 12.8a. As indicated earlier, i t is impractical t o l et T ..... O. I n p ractice, T is chosen t o be small b ut nonzero. We have already discussed t he effect o f a liasing a nd t he c onsequent distortion in t he frequency response caused by nonzero T . A ssuming t hat we have selected a suitable value o f T , we c an i gnore t he c ondition T ~ 0, a nd E q. (12.38) c an b e expressed as h[kJ = T ha(kT) (12.39) T he...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/14/2013 for the course ENG 350 taught by Professor Bayliss during the Spring '13 term at Northwestern.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online