Signal Processing and Linear Systems-B.P.Lathi copy

Thus t he complete closed loop frequency response can

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: osite effect of suppressing t he gain in t he vicinity ofwo, as shown in Fig. 7.l4e). A zero on t he i maginary axis a t jwo will totally suppress t he gain (zero gain) a t frequency woo R epeated zeros will further enhance t he effect. Also, a closely-placed pair of a pole a nd a zero (dipole) t end t o cancel o ut each other's influence on t he frequency response. Clearly, a proper placement of poles a nd zeros can yield a variety of frequency-selective behavior. Using these observations, we c an design lowpass, highpass, bandpass, a nd b andstop (or notch) filters. P hase response can also be computed graphically. In Fig. 7.l4a, angles formed by t he complex conjugate poles - 0 ± jwo a t w = 0 ( the origin) are equal a nd opposite. As w increases from 0 up, t he angle /1 1 because of t he pole - 0 + jwo, which has a negative value a t w = 0, is r educed in magnitude; t he angle /12 b ecause of t he pole - 0 - jwo, which has a positive value a t w = 0, increases in magnitude. As a r esult, /1 1+/12, t he s um of t he two angles, increases continuously, approaching a value 7r as w - > 00. T he r esulting p hase response L H(jw) = - (/1 1 +/12) is i llustrated in Fig. 7.l4c. Similar a rguments apply t o zeros a t - 0 ± jwo. T he r esulting phase response L H(jw) = (<PI + <P2) is d epicted in Fig. 7.l4f. 7 F requency Response a nd A nalog Filters 500 We now focus o n simple filters, using t he i ntuitive insights gained in this discussion. T he d iscussion is essentially qualitative. 7 .4-2 l ow p ass Filters A t ypical lowpass filter has a m aximum g ain a t W = O. T herefore, we need ~o p lace a pole (or poles) on t he r eal axis opposite t he origin (jw = 0 ), a s shown I n F ig. 7.15a. T he t ransfer f unction of t his s ystem is We H (s)=-s +w e W e have chosen t he n umerator o f H (s) t o b e W e in order t o n ormalize t he dc gain H(O) t o unity. I f d is t he d istance from t he pole - We t o a p oint j w (Fig. 7.15a), t hen IH(jw)1 = We d w ith H(O) = 1. As W increases, d increases a nd IH(jw)1 d ecreases monotonically w ith w , a s i llustrated i n Fig. 7.15d b y l abel n = 1. T his is c learly a lowpass filter with gain e nhanced i n t he v icinity of W = O. n =l ,x: ~T' - OJ c n =5 jOO o 7.4 F ilter Design b y P lacement o f Poles a nd Zeros Wall-to-wall Poles A n ideal lowpass filter characteristic (shaded) in Fig. 7.15d, has a const~nt g ain of unity up t o f requency W e. T hen t he g ain drops s uddenly t o 0 for W > W e' To achieve t he i deal lowpass characteristic, we need enhanced gain over t he e ntire frequency b and from 0 t o W e. We know t hat t o e nhance a gain a t a ny frequency w , we need t o p lace a pole opposite w. T o achieve a n e nhanced gain for all frequencies over t he b and (0 t o we), we n eed t o p lace a pole opposite every frequency in this b and. I n o ther words, we need a c ontinuous w all o f p oles facing t he i maginary axis opposite t he f requency b and 0 t o W e ( and from 0 t o -...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/14/2013 for the course ENG 350 taught by Professor Bayliss during the Spring '13 term at Northwestern.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online