Signal Processing and Linear Systems-B.P.Lathi copy

W hen t he two signals are orthogonal t he similarity

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: s. Such is n ot t he case w ith 15(t), where we notice t hat v ariations in f s(t) a re generally a t a higher r ate t han t hose in x (t). T here is still considerable similarity; b oth signals always remain positive, a nd show no oscillations. B oth signals have zero or negligible s trength b eyond t = 5. T hus, 15(t) is similar t o x (t), b ut n ot as similar as 14(t). T his is w hy en = 0.628 for 15(t). T he signal 16(t) is o rthogonal t o x (t), so t hat en = O. T his fact appears t o i ndicate t hat t he dissimilarity in this case is n ot as s trong as t hat o f h (t) for which en = - 1. T his conclusion may seem o dd b ecause h (t) a ppears more similar t o x (t) t han does /6(t). T he dissimilarity between x (t) a nd h (t) is o f t he n ature o f a ntipathy ( the worst enemy); in a way t hey a re very similar, b ut in opposite ways. O n t he o ther h and, t he d issimilarity of x (t) w ith 16(t) s tems from t he fact t hat t hey a re almost of different species o r from different planets; i t is of t he n ature o f being strangers t o each other. Hence its dissimilarity w ith x (t) r ates lower t han t hat w ith h (t). D. E xercise E 3.3 Show t hat en o f signals h (t) a nd / 3(t) i n Fig. 3.4 is - 1, t hat o f h (t) a nd ! 4(t) is 0.961, a nd t hat o f f a(t) a nd !6(t) is zero. \1 3.2-1 Application t o Signal Detection C orrelation between two signals is a n e xtremely i mportant c oncept which measures t he degree of similarity (agreement or alignment) between t he two signals. This concept is widely used for signal processing applications in radar, sonar, digital c ommunication, electronic warfare a nd m any o thers. We explain t his c oncept by a n e xample of r adar where a signal pulse is t ransmitted in order t o d etect a suspected t arget. I f a t arget is p resent, t he pulse will b e 180 3 Signal R epresentation by Orthogonal Sets reflected by it. I f a t arget is n ot p resent, t here will b e no reflected pulse, j ust noise. T he presence or absence of t he reflected pulse confirms the presence or absence of a target. T he c rucial p roblem in this procedure is t o detect t he heavily a ttenuated, reflected pulse ( of known waveform) buried in t he u nwanted noise signal. I n t his situation, correlation of t he received pulse with t he t ransmitted pulse can b e o f g reat help. A similar s ituation exists in digital communication where we a re required t o d etect t he presence of one of t he two known waveforms in t he presence of noise. We now e xplain q ualitatively how signal detection using correlation technique is accomplished. Consider t he case of binary communication, where two known waveforms are received in a r andom sequence. Each time we receive a pulse, our t ask is t o d etermine which of t he two (known) waveforms is received. To make t he d etection easier, we m ust make t he two pulses as dissimilar as possible. Therefore, we s hould select t he pulse t hat is t he n egative of t he o ther pulse. This choice give...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/14/2013 for the course ENG 350 taught by Professor Bayliss during the Spring '13 term at Northwestern.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online