Signal Processing and Linear Systems-B.P.Lathi copy

F15 30 20 10 f

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: d t IHUm)1 t L HUm) jm Re .... 0 m.... 0 -Ct. d' 0 mo m.... - 11 :i: ( c) (b) (a) t Im jmo t IHUm)1 • K IH(jw)1 = d (7.30) where t he e xact value of constant K is n ot i mportant a t t his point. As w increases from zero up, d decreases progressively until w reaches t he value woo As w increases beyond wo, d increases progressively. Therefore, according t o Eq. (7.30), t he a mplitude response IH (jw) 1 increases from w = 0 u ntil w = wo, a nd i t decreases continuously as w increases beyond wo, as i llustrated in Fig. 7.l4b. Therefore, a pole a t - 0 + jwo r esults in a frequency-selective behavior t hat enhances t he gain a t t he frequency Wo (resonance). Moreover, as t he pole moves closer t o t he i maginary axis (as 0 is reduced), this enhancement (resonance) becomes more pronounced. This is because 0 , t he d istance between t he pole a nd jwo (d c orresponding t o jwo), becomes smaller, which increases t he g ain K id. In t he e xtreme case, when 0 = 0 (pole on t he i maginary axis), t he gain a t Wo goes t o infinity. Repeated poles further enhance t he frequency-selective effect. To summarize, we c an enhance a gain a t a frequency Wo by placing a pole opposite t he p oint jwo. T he closer t he pole is t o jwo, t he higher is t he gain a t wo, a nd t he gain variation is more rapid (more frequencyselective) in the vicinity of frequency woo Note t hat a pole must be placed in t he L HP for stability. Here we have considered t he effect of a single complex pole on t he s ystem gain. For a real system, a complex pole - 0 + jwo m ust accompany its conjugate - 0 - jwo. We can readily show t hat t he presence of t he c onjugate pole does not appreciably change t he frequency-selective behavior in t he vicinity of woo T his is because t he gain in this case is K I d d', where d' is t he d istance of a point jw from t he c onjugate pole - 0 - jwo. Because t he c onjugate pole is far from jwo, t here is no d ramatic change in t he length d ' as w varies in t he vicinity of woo T here is a g radual increase in t he value of d ' as w increases, which leaves t he frequency-selective behavior as it was originally, with only minor changes. Gain Suppression by a Zero jm L HUm) 11 Re .... 0 -Ct. 499 t he a mplitude response IH (jw)1 for a certain value of w, we c onnect t he pole t o t he p oint j w (Fig. 7 .l4a). I f t he l ength of this line is d, t hen IH(jw)1 is p roportional t o L H(s)ls=p = (<PI + <P2 + . .. + <Pn) - (/11 + /12 + . .. + /1 n ) t 1m 7.4 Filter Design by Placement of Poles a nd Zeros 0 COo ro .... 0 00 . ... r' ,:~. (d) (e) ( t) F ig. 1 .14 The role of poles and zeros in determining the frequency response of an LTIC system. Gain Enhancement by a Pole To u nderstand t he effect o f poles a nd zeros on t he frequency response, consider a hypothetical c ase of a single pole - 0 + jwo, as depicted in Fig. 7.l4a. To find Using t he s ame argument, we observe t hat zeros a t - 0 ± jwo (Fig. 7 .l4d) will have exactly the opp...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/14/2013 for the course ENG 350 taught by Professor Bayliss during the Spring '13 term at Northwestern.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online