Unformatted text preview: had not yet been compiled nor consolidated. With the territorial expansion of the Islamic domain under the Umayyads, and the dispersal of jurists and Companions who were learned in the Hadith, direct access to them became increasingly difficult. Fear of isolating the Sunnah led the jurists to lay down certain rules which restricted free recourse to ra'y. In order to be valid, the jurists ruled, ra'y must derive its authority from the Shari'ah principles which are enunciated in the Qur'an and the Sunnah. This was the genesis of qiyas, which was initially a disciplined form of ra'y. However, the exercise of this relatively liberal form of ra'y during the formative stages of jurisprudence had already led to considerable disagreement among the fuqaha'. Those who called for a close adherence to the Hadith, namely the Ahl al-Hadith, mainly resided in the holy cities of Makkah and Madinah. The Ahl al-Hadith regarded the Sunnah to be supplementary to the Qur'an. They insisted on strict adherence to the Sunnah which, in their view, was a basic requirement of the faith. Acceptance of the faith, they argued, must be on a dogmatic basis without referring to the rationale causes (ta'lil) of its ordinances. They were, in other words, literalists who denied the mujtahid the liberty to resort to the basic rationale of the Shari'ah rules. Whenever they failed to find an explicit authority in the sources concerning a problem, they chose to remain silent and avoid recourse to ra'y. This they considered to be the essence of piety and unquestioning submission to God. [22. Khudari, Tarikh, p. 200ff.] The fuqaha' of Iraq, on the other hand, resorted more liberally to personal opinion, which is why they are known as Ahl al-Ra'y. In their view, the Shari'ah was in harmony with the dictates of reason. Hence they had little hesitation to refer, in their search for solutions to legal problems, both to the letter and the spirit of the Shari'ah ordinances. The Ahl al-Ra'y are thus known for their frequent resort to analogical reasoning and istihsan. As will be shown in the following pages, istihsan reflects an attempt on the part of the fuqaha at regulating the free exercise of ra'y in matters of law and religion. Any restrictions imposed on istihsan, such as the one that sought to turn istihsan into a technical formula, were basically designed to tilt the balance in the continuous debate over the use of ra'y versus literalism in favour of the latter. Yet those who saw istihsan as a predominantly rationalist doctrine had reservations over subjecting it to restrictions that eroded its rationalist content and rendered istihsan a mere subdivision of qiyas. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence ~ Kamali 223 Although the classical theory of usul al-fiqh tacitly recognised that in some cases analogical reasoning might entail injustice and that it was then permissible to resort to istihsan, this was, however, not to be regarded as 'giving human reason a sovereign role'. Istihsan and maslahah were to be applied strictly in the absence of a specific ruling in the Qur'an or the Sunnah. Qiyas Jali, Qiyas Khaf...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 04/13/2013 for the course ISLAM 101 taught by Professor Islam during the Spring '13 term at Harvey Mudd College.
- Spring '13