The same type of recognition criteria exist in

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: gal right to the asset or control over the separation of the asset? According to Lacroix (1996: 18), “it is possible that this fundamental doubt at the Board (IASC) reflects the need to settle the debate between the supporters of a strictly legal approach to the concept of an asset and the supporters of a substantive way of thinking which refers to the market”. In any case, identifiability can be considered an inclusion criterion for socio-legal recognition of the intangible item. The same type of recognition criteria exist in Belgium and Luxembourg’ accounting s standards, which state that if the estimated costs of internally generated intangibles are higher than the expected future benefits, it is not possible to capitalize these expenses. This general condition actually implies the presence of two exclusion criteria: assessment of the possible cost and risk level. 12 Taking tables 4 and 5 together, we can observe an implicit classification of intangibles emerging, based on two...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/02/2013 for the course ECONOMIC economics taught by Professor Economics during the Fall '13 term at Elmont Memorial High School.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online