{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

There is no intangible expense which by nature should

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ld be capitalized; • intangible expenses related to these assets, which are operating expenses even though they have an intangible nature. They go on to reach three conclusions: Ø This approach will in practice mean that, contrary to the inventory-style approach, very few intangible assets will be identified. A company may be able to develop one source of revenue, or even several, but only of a limited range: trademarks, files, patents, customer lists, specific knowhow, etc. Ø There is no intangible expense which by nature should always be capitalized; the matter should be considered case by case. R&D is one example. It should not necessarily be recorded as an asset; it can be an expense in support of output, maybe new products or patents. Ø Identification of intangible output should result in identification of intangible input which will be used to maintain or improve the value of the intangible output. It may therefore be advisable for accounting bodies and professionals to take a closer look at this new approach to intangibles, which is oriented towards th...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online