Unformatted text preview: nd closer to 5
4x3 0.00000025 −0.00000000125
0.000025
−0.00000125
0.0025
−0.00125
0.0025
0.00125
0.000025
0.00000125
0.00000025
0.00000000125 In other words, as x → ±∞, f (x) ≈ 4x3 (1 − 0 + 0) = 4x3 , which is the leading term of f . The
formal proof of Theorem 3.2 works in much the same way. Factoring out the leading term leaves
f (x) = an xn 1 + an−1
a2
a1
a0
+ ... +
+
+
n−2
n−1
an x
an x
an x
an xn As x → ±∞, any term with an x in the denominator becomes closer and closer to 0, and we have
f (x) ≈ an xn . Geometrically, Theorem 3.2 says that if we graph y = f (x), say, using a graphing
calculator, and continue to ‘zoom out,’ the graph of it and its leading term become indistinguishable.
Below are the graphs of y = 4x3 − x + 5 (the thicker line) and y = 4x3 (the thinner line) in two
diﬀerent windows. A view ‘close’ to the origin. A ‘zoomed out’ view. Let’s return to the function in Example 3.1.5, f (x) = x3 (x − 3)2 (x +2) x2 + 1 , whose sign diagram
and graph are reproduced below for reference. Theorem 3.2 tells us that the end behavior is the
same as that of its leading term, x8 . This tells us that the gr...
View
Full Document
 Fall '13
 Wong
 Algebra, Trigonometry, Cartesian Coordinate System, The Land, The Waves, René Descartes, Euclidean geometry

Click to edit the document details