Stitz-Zeager_College_Algebra_e-book

# For instance 1e 11 corresponds to 000000000001 which

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 3|2x + 1| > −2 analytically, we ﬁrst isolate the absolute value before applying Theorem 2.3. To that end, we get −3|2x + 1| > −6 or |2x + 1| < 2. Rewriting, we now have 3 −2 < 2x + 1 < 2 so that − 3 < x < 1 . In interval notation, we write − 2 , 1 . Graphically we 2 2 2 1 see the graph of y = 4 − 3|2x + 1| is above y = −2 for x values between − 3 and 2 . 2 y 4 3 2 1 −2 −1 1 2 x −1 −2 −3 −4 3. Rewriting the compound inequality 2 < |x − 1| ≤ 5 as ‘2 < |x − 1| and |x − 1| ≤ 5’ allows us to solve each piece using Theorem 2.3. The ﬁrst inequality, 2 < |x − 1| can be re-written as |x − 1| > 2 and so x − 1 < −2 or x − 1 > 2. We get x < −1 or x > 3. Our solution to the ﬁrst inequality is then (−∞, −1) ∪ (3, ∞). For |x − 1| ≤ 5, we combine results in Theorems 2.1 and 2.3 to get −5 ≤ x − 1 ≤ 5 so that −4 ≤ x ≤ 6, or [−4, 6]. Our solution to 2 < |x − 1| ≤ 5 is comprised of values of x which satisfy both parts of the inequality, and so we take what’s called the ‘set theoretic intersection’ of (−∞, −1) ∪...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 05/03/2013 for the course MATH Algebra taught by Professor Wong during the Fall '13 term at Chicago Academy High School.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online