{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}


If the result is equivalent to the original equation

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: and y : • the x-intercepts always have the form (x, 0); to find the x-intercepts of the graph, set y = 0 and solve for x. • y -intercepts always have the form (0, y ); to find the y -intercepts of the graph, set x = 0 and solve for y . Another fact which you may have noticed about the graph in the previous example is that it seems to be symmetric about the y -axis. To actually prove this analytically, we assume (x, y ) is a generic point on the graph of the equation. That is, we assume x2 + y 3 = 1. As we learned in Section 1.1, the point symmetric to (x, y ) about the y -axis is (−x, y ). To show the graph is symmetric about the y -axis, we need to show that (−x, y ) is on the graph whenever (x, y ) is. In other words, we need to show (−x, y ) satisfies the equation x2 + y 3 = 1 whenever (x, y ) does. Substituting gives ? (−x)2 + (y )3 = 1 x2 + y 3 = 1 When we substituted (−x, y ) into the equation x2 + y 3 = 1, we obtained the original equation back when we simplified. Th...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online