Stitz-Zeager_College_Algebra_e-book

Rewriting this in standard form we get y 2 x 4 and we

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: is the product of A with the second column of X and the third column of I3 is the product of A with the third column of X .6 In other words, we are solving three equations x11 1 x12 0 x13 0 A x21 = 0 A x22 = 1 A x23 = 0 x31 0 x32 0 x33 1 We can solve each of these systems using Cramer’s Rule. Focusing on the first system, we have 1 1 2 312 3 1 1 5 A2 = 0 0 5 A3 = 0 −1 0 A1 = 0 −1 0 1 4 204 2 1 0 5 We are developing a method in the forthcoming discussion. As with the discussion in Section 8.4 when we developed the first algorithm to find matrix inverses, we ask that you indulge us. 6 The reader is encouraged to stop and think this through. 8.5 Determinants and Cramer’s Rule 515 If we expand det (A1 ) along the first row, we get det (A1 ) = det −1 5 14 = det −1 5 14 − det 05 04 + 2 det 0 −1 0 1 Amazingly, this is none other than the C11 cofactor of A. The reader is invited to check this, as well as the claims that det (A2 ) = C12 and det (A3 ) = C13 .7 (To see this, though it seems unnatural to do so, expand along the fir...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/03/2013 for the course MATH Algebra taught by Professor Wong during the Fall '13 term at Chicago Academy High School.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online