Stitz-Zeager_College_Algebra_e-book

That is just as for any real number x 1 x x 1 x we

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 1000 −x ≥ 0 x2 1000 − x3 ≥ 0 common denominator x2 We consider the left hand side of the inequality as our rational function r(x). We see r is undefined at x = 0, but, as in the previous example, the applied domain of the problem is x > 0, so we are considering only the behavior of r on (0, ∞). The sole zero of r comes when 1000 − x3 = 0, which is x = 10. Choosing test values in the intervals (0, 10) and (10, ∞) gives the following diagram. (+) 0 (−) 0 10 We see r(x) > 0 on (0, 10), and since r(x) = 0 at x = 10, our solution is (0, 10]. In the context of the problem, h represents the height of the box while x represents the width (and depth) of the box. Solving h(x) ≥ x is tantamount to finding the values of x which result in a box where the height is at least as big as the width (and, in this case, depth.) Our answer tells us the width of the box can be at most 10 centimeters for this to happen. 3. As x → 0+ , h(x) = 1000 → ∞. This means the smaller the width x (and, in this cas...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/03/2013 for the course MATH Algebra taught by Professor Wong during the Fall '13 term at Chicago Academy High School.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online