Stitz-Zeager_College_Algebra_e-book

This argument gives us the following factorization

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ero, 2 , we get that it is not a zero, and we also see that it is an upper bound on the zeros of f , since all of the numbers in the final line of the division tableau are positive. This means there is no point trying our last possible rational zero, 3. Descartes’ Rule of Signs guaranteed us a positive real zero, and at this point we have shown this zero is irrational. Furthermore, 3 the Intermediate Value Theorem, Theorem 3.1, tells us the zero lies between 1 and 2 , since 3 f (1) < 0 and f 2 > 0. 1 2 2 4 −1 5 ↓1 2 −6 3 2 − 21 4 25 3 4 −3 − 21 8 − 45 8 1 2 4 −1 −6 ↓2 6 5 26 5 −1 −3 −1 −4 3 2 2 4 −1 −6 ↓ 3 21 57 2 4 27 19 2 33 4 −3 99 8 75 8 We now turn our attention to negative real zeros. We try the largest possible zero, − 1 . 2 Synthetic division shows us it is not a zero, nor is it a lower bound (since the numbers in 214 Polynomial Functions the final line of the division tableau do not alternate), so we proceed to −1. This division shows −1 is...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/03/2013 for the course MATH Algebra taught by Professor Wong during the Fall '13 term at Chicago Academy High School.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online