Stitz-Zeager_College_Algebra_e-book

We are putting it on 117 by denition we get 6 in

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: /3 , we have ourselves a ‘quadratic in disguise’ and we can rewrite x4/3 − x2/3 − 6 = 0 2 as x2/3 − x2/3 − 6 = 0. If we let u = x2/3 , then in terms of u, we get u2 − u − 6 = 0. Solving for u, we obtain u = −2 or u = 3. Replacing x2/3 back in for u, we get x2/3 = −2 or x2/3 = 3. To avoid the trouble we encountered in the discussion√ following Definition 5.5, √ 3 3 we √ convert back to radical notation. By interpreting x2/3 as x2 we have x2 = −2 now 3 or x2 = 3. Cubing both sides of these equations results in x2 = −8, which admits no √ real solution, or x2 = 27, which √ gives x = ±3 3. We construct a sign diagram and find √ x4/3 − x2/3 − 6 > 0 on −∞, −3 3 ∪ 3 3, ∞ . To check our answer graphically, we set f (x) = x2/3 and g (x) = x4/3 − 6. The solution to x2/3 < x4/3 − 6 corresponds to the inequality f (x) < g (x), which means we are looking for the x values for which the graph of f is below the graph of g . Using the ‘Intersect’ command we...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/03/2013 for the course MATH Algebra taught by Professor Wong during the Fall '13 term at Chicago Academy High School.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online