We have already determined that to make use of the

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ‘vertical compression’ or ‘vertical contraction’ by a factor of 2. 1.8 Transformations 95 by a factor of 2’ makes sense if we are scaling something by multiplying it by 2. Similarly, we believe words like ‘shrink’, ‘compression’ and ‘contraction’ all indicate something getting smaller, so if we scale something by a factor of 1 , we would say it ‘shrinks by a factor of 2’ - not ‘shrinks by 2 a factor of 1 .’ This is why we have written the descriptions ‘stretch by a factor of a’ and ‘shrink by 2 1 a factor of a ’ in the statement of the theorem. Second, in terms of inputs and outputs, Theorem 1.5 says multiplying the outputs from a function by positive number a causes the graph to be vertically scaled by a factor of a. It is natural to ask what would happen if we multiply the inputs of a function by a positive number. This leads us to our last transformation of the section. Referring to the graph of f given at the beginning of this section, suppose we want to graph g (x) = f (2x). In...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/03/2013 for the course MATH Algebra taught by Professor Wong during the Fall '13 term at Chicago Academy High School.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online