Stitz-Zeager_College_Algebra_e-book

We see immediately that x 0 is a zero of multiplicity

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: s of Equations and Matrices also know that the process by which we find A−1 is determined completely by A, and not by the constants in B . This answers the question as to why we would bother doing row operations on a super-sized augmented matrix to find A−1 instead of an ordinary augmented matrix to solve a system; by finding A−1 we have done all of the row operations we ever need to do, once and for all, since we can quickly solve any equation AX = B using one multiplication, A−1 B . We illustrate this in our next example. 3 1 2 5 Example 8.4.1. Let A = 0 −1 2 1 4 1. Use row operations to find A−1 . Check your answer by finding A−1 A and AA−1 . 2. Use A−1 to solve the 3x + y + 2 z −y + 5z (a) 2x + y + 4 z following systems of equations = 26 3x + y + 2 z = 4 = 39 −y + 5z = 2 (b) = 117 2x + y + 4 z = 5 3x + y + 2 z = 1 −y + 5z = 0 (c) 2x + y + 4 z = 0 Solution. 1. We begin with a super-sized augmented matrix and proceed with Gauss-Jordan elimination. 3 1 2 0 −1 5 2 1 4 2 1 1 3 3 0 −1 5 2 1 4 1 2 1 3 3 0 −1 5 8 1 0 3 3 1 2 1 3 3 0 1 −5...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online