Stitz-Zeager_College_Algebra_e-book

# X 0 y 1 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 x 1 y h

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: at all, both of these values of x still cause trouble in the denominator, and so, by Theorem 4.1, x = −2 and x = 2 are vertical asymptotes of the graph. We can actually go a step farther at this point and determine exactly how the graph approaches the asymptote near each of these values. Though not absolutely necessary,4 it is good practice for those heading oﬀ to Calculus. For the discussion that follows, it is best to use the factored form of 3x f (x) = (x−2)(x+2) . • The behavior of y = f (x) as x → −2: Suppose x → −2− . If we were to build a table of values, we’d use x-values a little less than −2, say −2.1, −2.01 and −2.001. While there is no harm in actually building a table like we did in Section 4.1, we want to develop a ‘number sense’ here. Let’s think about each factor in the formula of f (x) as we imagine substituting a number like x = −2.000001 into f (x). The quantity 3x would be very close to −6, the quantity (x − 2) would be very close to −4, and the factor (x + 2) would be very close to 0. More speciﬁcally, (x + 2) would be a little less than 0, in this case, −0.000001. We will call such a number a ‘very small (−)’, ‘very small’ meaning close to zero in absolute value. So, mentally, as x → −2− , we estimate f (x) = 3x −6 3 ≈ = (x − 2)(x + 2) (−4) (very small (−)) 2 (very small (−)) Now, the closer x gets to −2, the smaller (x + 2) will become, and so even thoug...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online