GOV_312L_feb29 - Feb 20 Social Democracy in Sweden 1...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Feb 20 Social Democracy in Sweden 1. Underlying Values of Social Democracy a. Similarities and differences to the values underlying liberal democracy i. Liberal Democracy 1. Individualism a. “Fair rules” 2. Equality of opportunity ii. Social Democracy 1. Equality a. “Fair outcome” 2. In between individual liberty and social equality a. Compromise/Balance 3. Equality of opportunity a. But not with the inequality of outcome i. Provides support for people ii. Basic floor of protection b. Social democracy as full democracy i. Sweden is a FULL DEMOCRACY not Socialist ii. Gradually reform liberal democracy 1. Progressive tax iii. Not less democratic than liberal democracy 1. More participation (85%) iv. Way for lower social classes to advance 2. Driving forces of Social democracy in Sweden a. The importance of universal suffrage i. Equal political opportunity to all 1. Political equals ii. Large number would have political influence 1. Everyone’s votes have equal value iii. Political Demand 1. Reason why Social democracy is a full democracy b. The importance of collective organization i. Large number or poorer people ii. Must have an institutional opening which translates large number into influence 1. Able to make change iii. c. The rise of labor movement i. Labor unions = social democratic party 3. Historical origins of Swedish Social Democracy a. Social-Structural factors i. Similar social factors ii. Common ground b. Political-Institutional factors i. Institutions push for collective organization
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
FEB. 22 Social Democracy in Sweden - II 4. Labor and Business: The attempt to find a balance a. From confrontation to compromise i. b. Organized consultation between business, labor, and the State (“Corporatism”) i. Shifted away from conflict (1930s) ii. After social democratic party took over in 1932 1. Strengthens trade unions, forcing business to cooperate and compromise 2. Both sides gave up their “maximum” goals/demands a. More centralistic view from both sides b. More regulation, redistribution but not taking away property 5. Crucial policies and programs of social democracy in Sweden a. Very limited “Socialization” i. Went from confrontation to compromise ii. Could not nationalize everything
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 6

GOV_312L_feb29 - Feb 20 Social Democracy in Sweden 1...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online