VIS 22 Midterm Notes

VIS 22 Midterm Notes - Introduction Assumptions of modern...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Introduction Assumptions of modern art transgressive, shocking, or critical A change from portraying authority/religion to becoming critical Pre-modern veneration/awe To uncertainty, anger, confusion Marie Antoinette a symbol of the callous indifference/decadence of French upper-class Portrait by Vigee-LeBrun ex. of painting as a device for characterization Reinforcing images/propaganda changes To John Harfield (for ex.) cutting head off police chief in his painting Vincent van Gogh, Potato Eaters (1885) showing toil of lower classes not idealizing royalty paying respect to the simple or poor Earlier: faithful representations of reality & the technical skills to achieve realism (changes in the 19 th century) Changes in: Authority -Celebrate rich to a critique/attack of power in society Viewer -Shift in relationship to viewer obeisance/awe to shock Other Cultural Forms -Art’s relationship to other cultural modes mass/popular culture (usually oppositional relationship) Defined by principle of negation A foil to consumer/political culture (Something modern art has competition/is threatened by) Changes of patronage of modern art How it was supported/paid for originally, patronage by noblemen directly Emergence of “art market” arts are bought/sold like commodities “frees” the artist creates a notion of “autonomy” Chadderton by Henry Wallace ex. of dilemma of artist beginnings of tension between public (John Chamberlain quote) From Veneration to Dissidence Pleasing, worship-inducing paintings for patrons This changes in the modern period who he painted for is not clear From Hyancinth Rigand, Portrait of Louis XIV (17 th Century) to a shift to an aggressive style of art
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Who is supporting? Bought/sold on art market The rich/powerful are still buying art up to the end of this transition, but the relationship of painting to buyer + market changes Desire to express what’s within the public might not appreciate it Comfortable relationship w/ patron (“intimate”) To being ‘lost’ Where is my audience/Who wants my work (Chadderton) However; before these was Baroque Painting (1720s-1760s) Ex. of traditional patronage -Francois Boucher, Diana Bathing (1742) -Jean-Antoine Watteau -Jean-Honore Fragonard, Swarms of Cupids -“soft” + pastel colors, rounded flesh (no straining bodies) relaxed poses not trying to ‘shock’ Wagon in the Mud most abject thing displayed beautifully; everything round/monumental -low saturation colors softened hues Tonality across painting is not extreme/ does not abruptly change; soft Aristocrats at play
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/07/2008 for the course VIS 22 taught by Professor Kester during the Winter '08 term at UCSD.

Page1 / 23

VIS 22 Midterm Notes - Introduction Assumptions of modern...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online