Madness or Manipulation Essay 3 .docx - James Mallard...

Doc Preview
Pages 7
Total views 4
James Mallard Engl-1302-045 Professor Espinoza May 5th, 2019 Madness or Manipulation The story of Hamlet, written by the playwright William Shakespeare, is well known as one of the most popular tales of revenge, which is shifted by family dynamics politically. Through reading the play of Hamlet, there is a lot issued in the backbone of relationships that are made between each other. This can be seen through the relationship between the ghost of King Hamlet and his son Prince Hamlet. That focuses on the honest way that King Hamlet was poisoned by his brother Claudius and that is where Prince Hamlet knows the truth. He wants to take revenge with the betrayal that was stated in the beginning of the play. The tension in the relationship between family members caused the betrayal. Along with that, King Claudius has already taken Queen Gertrude to be his wife and that would certainly be a form of conflict if it was here and now. In the play Hamlet, there is no black and white and many scholar’s resources have different ideas of the madness mindsets that were governing different types of controlling manners. These characteristics are very well related to different feelings of confusion, desperation, insanity, manipulation, conflict, and governing among the parts of the family members. Also, a lot of these acts have a lot to do with the Greek Gods and the Roman Empire. The mentality even asks the readers if the characters are taking certain sides. There is one that mainly stands out and it is the relationship between madness in the actions of the major characters and political power of the control that keeps happening in the plot. The explanation of this is perceivable encircling irony, symbolism, and point of view.
Within the story Hamlet, there was a lot of irony between the relationship of Hamlet and Claudius as two of the main players. The differences among them was that Claudius seemed to carry some pride becoming the king instantly, whereas Hamlet was still struggling from the loss of his own father. It seems like it would be less ironic if King Claudius acted more sympathetic towards Prince Hamlet, but it came off completely different with the behavior of the desire for political power. This conflict was being shown in Act I when the funeral of King Hamlet and the wedding of Claudius and Queen Gertrude were at the same event. This form of dryness is seen as Claudius not even caring about what Prince Hamlet was going through. Hamlet had to face reality and wasn’t necessarily ready for it, considering the bad faith when dealing with Claudius. It is very well stated that Claudius was focusing on the throne, instead of the mourning that Hamlet had to wear a mask for. There was not any structure of balance between King Claudius
Course Hero Badge

Want to read all 7 pages?

Previewing 3 of 7 pages Upload your study docs or become a member.
Course Hero Badge

Want to read all 7 pages?

Previewing 3 of 7 pages Upload your study docs or become a member.
Course Hero Badge

End of preview

Want to read all 7 pages? Upload your study docs or become a member.