88-Florencio-Deudor-vs-JM-Tuason

However this conclusion of the appellants is legally

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: f February 28, 1957, be so modified as to delete therefrom all references to the four- month period for the delivery of the 30 "quiñones" and to appellees' discharge from their obligation petitions under the compromise agreement, and that the Sheriff be ordered "to clear the premises of said 30 'quiñones' of all persons unlawfully squatting on or occupying the same or portions thereof." Gregorio Araneta, Inc. in turn, filed a motion, dated August 16, 1957, alleging, inter alia, that the Deudors had not delivered the aforementioned portion of 30 "Quiñones", despite the expiration of the period of four (4) months, fixed in the order of February 28, 1957, and that, owing to the failure of the Deudors to make said delivery, the construction of houses by squatters within said area had continued so unabated that, as of August 12, 1957, there were 341 constructions therein, and praying that an order be issued directing the Sheriff of Quezon C...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 07/12/2013 for the course LAW 101 taught by Professor Tan during the Winter '11 term at University of the Philippines Diliman.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online