Calc 172 lab1b - 2. 0.752926 4. 0.392691 8. 0.196343 16....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 2. 0.752926 4. 0.392691 8. 0.196343 16. 0.0981707 32. 0.0490851 64. 0.0245425 128. 0.0122712 4. 0.0000124037 8. 3.84792.10- 6 16. 1.02215.10- 6 32. 2.5963.10- 7 64. 6.51689.10- 8 128. 1.63086.10- 8 4. 4.7079.10- 6 8. 1.80363.10- 6 16. 5.02887.10- 7 32. 1.29292.10- 7 64. 3.25516.10- 8 128. 8.15226.10- 9 Trapezoid Rule Midpoint Rule For the second part of Lab 1 in Calculus 172, we were to approximate the integral r p E^ H- x^2 L x using Right Hand Riemann Sums, Midpoint Sums, and Trapezoid Sums. Previously we had done so using the Left Riemann Sum method and are now testing these methods as comparisons. The purpose is to find out the approximation error with each technique, compare them, and then use our results to possibly find a fifth formula which can calculate our results even closer. Using the right hand rule gave us the results below. In this table, the left column shows the number of subintervals used and the right displays the equivalent approximation error for the defined number of subintervals. Our results are very similar to those gained from using the Left Hand rule. This is to be expected as the Right Hand method is merely a mirror of the other. mirror of the other....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/07/2008 for the course MATH 172 taught by Professor Pietraho during the Spring '08 term at Bowdoin College.

Page1 / 3

Calc 172 lab1b - 2. 0.752926 4. 0.392691 8. 0.196343 16....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online