ARTICLE CRITIQUE2IntroductionThe research study, "The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalistcommunity nurses," by Harris and co-authors, aims to give the reader an oversight on the riskfactors related to common lifestyle behavior. Some of the lifestyle behaviors addressed in thearticle comprise alcohol drinking, inadequate nutrition, fewer exercises, and smoking. Mainly,the researchers intended to evaluate the public healthcare system by examining the rolecommunity nurses play in the system's effectiveness. Community nurses have a critical role inthe public healthcare system, and the details of these roles are available in the article namedabove. Nonetheless, this paper intends to provide a critique of the article. This critique will befocused on the study’s methodology, the procedures applied, and findings. Besides, the paperwill also explain how the implication of the research to evidence-based practice.The Credibility of the Research Design MethodsThe researchers engaged in a high level of credibility in achieving the objectives of thestudy. Firstly, Harris et al. (2013) adequately address the problem affecting the efficiency oflifestyle intervention of community nursing practice. The use of logical ideas, broad analysis ofthe content, accurate selection of study samples, and availing discussions that are supported withrelevant scholarly evidence make the article even more credible for use. Considering themortality rate brought by chronic diseases such as cancer, hypertension, and others, a study toinvestigate the lifestyle causes and recommendations on the same is very necessary. Theresearchers provide a description of the factors that highly contribute to chronic illness and theways of avoiding such through lifestyle intervention. Moreover, the statistical information in thestudy can be used in providing mitigations to curb the situation. Thus, the article is essential inreducing the increasing cases of chronic diseases and mortality rates.