{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

STUDY GUIDE ANSWERS Part 2

STUDY GUIDE ANSWERS Part 2 - b Xi 96.08 X = 1.5(2.7 96.08 =...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
b) 7 . 2 08 . 96 X 5 . 1 ± ² i ; X i = +1.5 (2.7) + 96.08 = 4.05 + 96.08 = 100.13 ; 7 . 2 08 . 96 X 8 . ± ± i ; X i = -.8 (2.7) + 96.08 = -2.16 + 96.08 = 93.92 2. a) area above z = -.4 = .1544 + .5 = .6544, so 65.44 area above z = .93 = .1762, so %; 17.62 % b) area beyond z = .4 is .1554, so 15.54 % Chapter 5 1. 67 . 4 54 . 52 . 2 25 7 . 2 6 . 98 08 . 96 70 . 2 , 08 . 96 X ± ± ± z V This z is larger in magnitude than the critical value (1.96) so the result is significant at the .05 level (two-tailed). 2. 33 . 9 100 7 . 2 52 . 2 ± ± z For D = .01, z crit = 2.33 (one-tailed), or 2.58 (two-tailed). In either case these results are easily significant at the .01 level. Because the sample size was 4 times larger for part b than part a, the z-score from part a could have been simply multiplied by 2 (i.e., the square-root of 4). Chapter 6 1. a) 25 7 . 2 x V ; x crit z X V P r = 96.08 ± 1.96 (.54); so, P = 96.08 ± 1.06 Therefore, the 95% CI goes from 95.02 to 97.14 (note, as a check, that the sum of these two limits is 192.16, which is exactly twice as large as the sample mean, as will always be the case). Because the proposed population mean of 98.6 is not in this 95% CI, we know that the sample mean would differ significantly from this population mean at the .05 level.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}